ObjectiveTo evaluate radiologist agreement on the quantification of bronchiectasis by
high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).Materials and MethodsThe HRCT scans of 43 patients with bronchiectasis were analyzed by two
radiologists, who used a scoring system to grade the findings. Kappa
(κ) values and overall agreement were calculated.ResultsFor the measurement and appearance of bronchiectasis, the interobserver
agreement was moderate (κ = 0.45 and κ = 0.43, respectively),
as was the intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.54 and κ = 0.47,
respectively). Agreement on the presence of mucous plugging was fair, for
central distribution (overall interobserver agreement of 68.3% and κ
= 0.39 for intraobserver agreement) and for peripheral distribution
(κ = 0.34 and κ = 0.35 for interobserver and intraobserver
agreement, respectively). The agreement was also fair for peribronchial
thickening (κ = 0.21 and κ = 0.30 for interobserver and
intraobserver agreement, respectively). There was fair interobserver and
intraobserver agreement on the detection of opacities (κ = 0.39 and
71.9%, respectively), ground-glass attenuation (64.3% and κ = 0.24,
respectively), and cysts/bullae (κ = 0.47 and κ = 0.44,
respectively). Qualitative analysis of the HRCT findings of bronchiectasis
and the resulting individual patient scores showed that there was an
excellent correlation between the observers (intraclass correlation
coefficient of 0.85 and 0.81 for interobserver and intraobserver agreement,
respectively).ConclusionIn the interpretation of HRCT findings of bronchiectasis, radiologist
agreement appears to be fair. In our final analysis of the findings using
the proposed score, we observed excellent interobserver and intraobserver
agreement.