2021
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1959507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for facial erythema of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most used laser modality for vascular lesions is a pulsed dye laser (PDL) with a wavelength of 585-595 nm. Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment consists of a broadband spectrum of light sources, ranging from 500 to 1,200 nm, that targets vascular lesions using filters of specific wavelength cutoffs [5]. Lower cutoffs are effective in treating telangiectasias in the superficial dermis, beneficial in reducing facial background erythema [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most used laser modality for vascular lesions is a pulsed dye laser (PDL) with a wavelength of 585-595 nm. Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment consists of a broadband spectrum of light sources, ranging from 500 to 1,200 nm, that targets vascular lesions using filters of specific wavelength cutoffs [5]. Lower cutoffs are effective in treating telangiectasias in the superficial dermis, beneficial in reducing facial background erythema [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower cutoffs are effective in treating telangiectasias in the superficial dermis, beneficial in reducing facial background erythema [6]. Though both PDL and IPL displayed similar efficacy in reducing facial erythema [4,5,7], IPL provides some technical advantages, such as faster coverage and a lack of a consumable cooling technology (dye kit and cryogen spray cooling) [7]. Success in the treatment of erythema and telangiectasias using IPL has been widely documented [6]; Kassir et al [6] used IPL with 420-530 nm cutoff filter and about 70% of rosacea patients had reduction in redness and flushing; Papageorgiou et al [8] used IPL with 560 nm cutoff filter to successfully treat rosacea-related erythema and telangiectasia with minimal and selflimiting side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that there was no significant difference between intense pulsed light and pulsed dye laser in terms of decreasing erythema. Finally, in a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser for treating facial erythema in rosacea, it was found that there were no significant differences between the two techniques regarding their effects in decreasing erythema [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with pulsed dye laser (PDL), IPL has milder adverse reactions, wide uses, high skin coverage, and low cost 9 . A meta‐study showed that PDL and IPL have similar efficacy in the treatment of facial erythema in patients with rosacea, but IPL has more technical advantages 10 . BBL is a module of the profile platform multifunctional laser treatment system produced by Sciton Company in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%