2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed electrochemical synthesis of formate using Pb electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[31][32][33][34] The majority of eCO 2 R studies reported to date have focused on constant-potential operation, and these potentialreversing studies establish anodic treatments and pulsed-potential methods as a promising approach to improve durability of the eCO 2 R. 30,31,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] More recently, similar pulse methods have garnered increasing attention as an attractive option to influence electrocatalytic processes and reaction selectivity beyond mainstream efforts to modify the catalyst and electrolyte. 32,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] These mainstream efforts include surface faceting, nanostructuring the catalyst, modifying the electrochemical cell design, including additives in the electrolyte to control the ionic environment and pH, as well as combining copper with other metals to create bimetallic catalysts. 5 Catalysts structured with predominantly (100) facets, high electrochemically active surface areas, and more undercoordinated sites can favor C 2+ products.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33][34] The majority of eCO 2 R studies reported to date have focused on constant-potential operation, and these potentialreversing studies establish anodic treatments and pulsed-potential methods as a promising approach to improve durability of the eCO 2 R. 30,31,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] More recently, similar pulse methods have garnered increasing attention as an attractive option to influence electrocatalytic processes and reaction selectivity beyond mainstream efforts to modify the catalyst and electrolyte. 32,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] These mainstream efforts include surface faceting, nanostructuring the catalyst, modifying the electrochemical cell design, including additives in the electrolyte to control the ionic environment and pH, as well as combining copper with other metals to create bimetallic catalysts. 5 Catalysts structured with predominantly (100) facets, high electrochemically active surface areas, and more undercoordinated sites can favor C 2+ products.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhancement of the CO formation reaches a maximum of 41.1 % at −1.05 V vs. RHE when more Pb is present in the form of a Cu/Pb ratio of 9.0, resulting from the formation of more metallic Pb and the subsequent stronger Cu−Pb synergy under reaction conditions. The increase in HCOOH FE for Cu 9.00 Pb 1.00 compared to Cu 9.20 Pb 0.80 suggests that the HCOOH formation is intrinsically promoted by Pb species [53–56] . However, when even more Pb is introduced, the enhancement effect for CO production is weakened, which is explained by the lower tendency of Cu 8.65 Pb 1.35 to form metallic Cu and Pb under these reaction conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The increase in HCOOH FE for Cu 9.00 Pb 1.00 compared to Cu 9.20 Pb 0.80 suggests that the HCOOH formation is intrinsically promoted by Pb species. [53][54][55][56] However, when even more Pb is introduced, the enhancement effect for CO production is weakened, which is explained by the lower tendency of Cu 8.65 Pb 1.35 to form metallic Cu and Pb under these reaction conditions. Therefore, CO production dramatically decreases in Cu 8.65 Pb 1.35 due to the absence of a synergistic effect between metallic Cu and Pb, and the catalytic performance is similar to pure Cu (Figure 3a).…”
Section: Chemcatchemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that the choice of solvent has an impact on the coverage of the catalyst by the binder, which in turn influences the product distribution during CO 2 RR. [43] (a) (b)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%