2018
DOI: 10.14740/jocmr3354w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed Radiofrequency as a Minimally Invasive Treatment Option in Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis of 26 Patients

Abstract: BackgroundChronic abdominal pain is occasionally due to entrapped intercostal nerve endings (ACNES, abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome). If abdominal wall infiltration using an anesthetic agent is unsuccessful, a neurectomy may be considered. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a relatively new treatment option for various chronic pain syndromes. Evidence regarding a beneficial effect of this minimally invasive technique in ACNES is lacking. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of PRF treatment in ACN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous sham‐controlled randomized controlled trial on neurectomy in patients with ACNES showed a 70% rate of success in the neurectomy group . Based on our retrospective case series and the available literature on PRF treatment, a 30% success rate was expected in the PRF group; almost one third of patients could be spared a neurectomy . The targeted effect size is a difference in proportion responding to treatment (neurectomy vs. PRF) of 40% (ie, 70% responding in the neurectomy group vs. 30% in the PRF group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous sham‐controlled randomized controlled trial on neurectomy in patients with ACNES showed a 70% rate of success in the neurectomy group . Based on our retrospective case series and the available literature on PRF treatment, a 30% success rate was expected in the PRF group; almost one third of patients could be spared a neurectomy . The targeted effect size is a difference in proportion responding to treatment (neurectomy vs. PRF) of 40% (ie, 70% responding in the neurectomy group vs. 30% in the PRF group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In recent literature, only 2 case reports suggested that PRF at the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) was successful in patients with ACNES (eg, reduction of pain and improving quality of life) . Recently, a retrospective case series of 26 patients with ACNES found that PRF administered just underneath the anterior fascia of the rectus abdominis was effective in half of the patients . These encouraging results resulted in the execution of the present randomized controlled trial comparing PRF treatment with an anterior neurectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Sensations such as paresthesia, numbness, or the recognizable pain should occur at <0.5 V if the needle’s position is correct 43. This technique was not used in the presented case series but may potentially diminish low volumes of local anesthetics for diagnostic nerve blockades as also observed in ACNES patients 44. In our series, 11 of 14 patients reported a temporary pain relief of days to weeks after the diagnostic injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…An alternative, relatively painless, nonsurgical treatment option is pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), which, in adults, has a short-term treatment success of 38% to 50% 6-8 weeks after PRF [41,42]. Treatment success in these studies was defined as decrease in pain of more than 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%