Objective: The aim of this study was to discuss patient history and subjective findings at physical examination in a large case series to validate a proposed comprehensive set of major and minor diagnostic criteria. Summary Background Data: Chronic abdominal pain in some patients is caused by the anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES). ACNES is a clinical diagnosis as no functional testing or imaging modalities are available up to date. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed prospectively obtained data from consecutive patients who received the diagnosis ACNES during evaluation at the SolviMáx Center of Excellence for Abdominal Wall and Groin Pain, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, between June 1, 2011 and September 1, 2016. Questionnaires, standard case forms, and digital case files containing characteristics of individuals were used for analysis. Results: Data of 1116 patients suspected and treated for ACNES consistently showed the presence of the following 4 characteristics: sensory disturbances at the painful abdominal area (78%), a positive pinch sign (78%), a positive Carnett's sign (87%), and a positive response to a modified rectus sheath block (>50% pain reduction, 81%). The majority of patients are female of young or middle age with a normal BMI reporting complaints that occurred spontaneously in either a sudden or gradual timeframe, developing a severe (NRS 6-8) chronic abdominal pain that was only diagnosed after a substantial doctor's delay. Conclusion: A combination of typical findings in history and physical examination, combined with a positive modified rectus sheath block, may allow for diagnosing ACNES in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

No abstract

& AbstractBackground: Chronic abdominal pain can be due to entrapped intercostal nerves (anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome [ACNES]). If abdominal wall infiltration using an anesthetic agent is unsuccessful, a neurectomy may be considered. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applies an electric field around the tip of the cannula near the affected nerve to induce pain relief. Only limited retrospective evidence suggests that PRF is effective in ACNES.Methods: A multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, controlled proof-of-concept trial was performed in 66 patients. All patients were scheduled for a neurectomy procedure. Thirty-three patients were randomized to first receive a 6minute cycle of PRF treatment, while the other 33 were allocated to an immediate neurectomy procedure. Pain was recorded using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain possible]). Successful treatment was defined as >50% pain reduction. Patients in the PRF group were allowed to cross over to a neurectomy after 8 weeks.Results: The neurectomy group showed greater pain reduction at 8-week follow-up (mean change from baseline À2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] À3.9 to À1.7) vs. À1.5 (95% CI À2.3 to À0.6); P = 0.045) than the PRF group. Treatment success was reached in 12 of 32 (38%, 95% CI 23 to 55) of the PRF group and 17 of 28 (61%, 95% CI 42 to 72) of the neurectomy group (P = 0.073). Thirteen patients were withdrawn from their scheduled surgery. Adverse events were comparable between treatments.

BackgroundChronic abdominal pain is occasionally due to entrapped intercostal nerve endings (ACNES, abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome). If abdominal wall infiltration using an anesthetic agent is unsuccessful, a neurectomy may be considered. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a relatively new treatment option for various chronic pain syndromes. Evidence regarding a beneficial effect of this minimally invasive technique in ACNES is lacking. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of PRF treatment in ACNES patients.MethodsA series of ACNES patients undergoing PRF treatment between January 2014 and December 2015 in two hospitals were retrospectively evaluated. Pain was recorded prior to treatment and after 6 weeks using a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)). Successful treatment was defined as > 50% NRS pain reduction. Patient satisfaction was scored by patient global impression of change (PGIC, 1 = very much worse, to 7 = very much improved).ResultsTwenty-six patients were studied (17 women, median age 47 years, range 18 - 67 years). After 6 weeks, mean NRS score had dropped from 6.7 ± 1.2 to 3.8 ± 2.3 (P < 0.001). A mean 4.9 ± 1.4 PGIC score was reported by then. Short term treatment success (6 - 8 weeks) was 50% (n = 13, 95% CI: 29 - 71), while 8% was pain-free on the longer term (median 15 months). Median effect duration was 4 months (range 2 - 26).ConclusionsPRF is temporarily effective in half of patients with ACNES. PRF is safe and may be favored in neuropathic pain syndromes as nerve tissue destruction is possibly limited. A randomized controlled trial determining the potential additional role of PRF in the treatment strategy for ACNES is underway.

Background and objective: Obesity is associated with increased dyspnoea and reduced health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Studies on the effects of obesity on exercise capacity showed divergent results. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of obesity on weightbearing versus weight-supported exercise tolerance in obese and normal weight patients, matched for age, gender and degree of airflow limitation. Methods: Retrospective analyses of data obtained during pre-pulmonary rehabilitation assessment in 108 obese COPD patients (OB) (age: 61.2 ± 5.3y, FEV1: 43.2 ± 7.4%, BMI: 34.1 ± 3.9 kg/m