1989
DOI: 10.1109/23.34553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulser injection with subsequent removal-implementation and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the peak shape performance was adequate, the impressive results were the energy stability and the quantitative accuracy of the activity measurements. Primarily due to the use of the pulse injection system [4] for energy calibration and rate effects corrections, the calculated energy of the 1408 keV line never deviated more than 0.23 keV from the correct value even though the 1408 kev peak centroid dropped almost 3 channels at the highest rate; and, the quantitative activity reported was always within the measurement uncertainty of the standard value. Figure 5 presents the percentage recovery of the activity value computed from the 1408 keV line as a function of the input counting rate.…”
Section: Calibration and Testingmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the peak shape performance was adequate, the impressive results were the energy stability and the quantitative accuracy of the activity measurements. Primarily due to the use of the pulse injection system [4] for energy calibration and rate effects corrections, the calculated energy of the 1408 keV line never deviated more than 0.23 keV from the correct value even though the 1408 kev peak centroid dropped almost 3 channels at the highest rate; and, the quantitative activity reported was always within the measurement uncertainty of the standard value. Figure 5 presents the percentage recovery of the activity value computed from the 1408 keV line as a function of the input counting rate.…”
Section: Calibration and Testingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As described previously [3], each spectrometer is provided with a NIM amplifier and ADC with histogramming memory implemented in Canberra Acquisition Interface Modules (AIMs). The spectrometer systems implement the INL technology of pulse injection with subsequent removal that we find to be essential for unattended systems [4].…”
Section: A Sample Routing and Fpms Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) (2) (3) The FPMS gamma-ray detectors have standard commercial pulse processing electronics modified to implement the INL pulse injection with subsequent removal technology [9]. This provides quality assurance data in the gamma-ray spectra that the authors believe is essential for unattended operation of the gamma-ray spectrometers.…”
Section: The Fpms Design Installation and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With suitable spectrum conversion routines, it can be used to analyze data from almost any manufacturers spectrometer system. PCGAP can control the operation of a Canberra Acquisition Interface Module (AIM) spectrometer equipped with an INEEL developed pulse injection system for individual spectrum validation [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%