2014
DOI: 10.1364/josab.31.000780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pump-degenerate phase-sensitive amplification in chalcogenide waveguides

Abstract: We experimentally demonstrate phase-sensitive amplification based on pump-degenerate four-wave mixing in dispersion-engineered chalcogenide waveguides. We achieve a maximum extinction ratio of 18 dB with a pump peak power of 6.7 W. The variation of the gain as a function of relative phase, pump power, and bandwidth is theoretically analyzed and experimentally studied. Additionally, an analytical formula relating the phase-transfer curve to the experimental gain curve is derived. Numerical calculations show str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, FRBs can be divided into two categories, one is non-repeating and the other is repeating. Accordingly, two class of models have been proposed, namely, the catastrophic model for the non-repeating bursts (Kashiyama et al 2013;Falcke & Rezzolla 2014;Zhang 2014;Geng & Huang 2015;Zhang 2016;Wang et al 2016;Yamasaki et al 2018;Zhang 2017) and the non-catastrophic model for the repeating bursts (Loeb et al 2014;Kulkarni et al 2014;Katz 2016;Gu et al 2016;Dai et al 2016;Lyutikov et al 2016;Metzger et al 2017). So far tens of FRBs have been observed, among which eleven bursts are found to be repeating (Spitler et al 2016;Amiri et al 2019;Andersen et al 2019;Kumar et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, FRBs can be divided into two categories, one is non-repeating and the other is repeating. Accordingly, two class of models have been proposed, namely, the catastrophic model for the non-repeating bursts (Kashiyama et al 2013;Falcke & Rezzolla 2014;Zhang 2014;Geng & Huang 2015;Zhang 2016;Wang et al 2016;Yamasaki et al 2018;Zhang 2017) and the non-catastrophic model for the repeating bursts (Loeb et al 2014;Kulkarni et al 2014;Katz 2016;Gu et al 2016;Dai et al 2016;Lyutikov et al 2016;Metzger et al 2017). So far tens of FRBs have been observed, among which eleven bursts are found to be repeating (Spitler et al 2016;Amiri et al 2019;Andersen et al 2019;Kumar et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for large beaming, FRBs seem to be produced by compact objects of stellar origin such as neutron stars, magnetars or gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In fact, a number of models have been proposed in relation to such objects: delayed collapses of supermassive neutron stars to black holes [7], magnetar flares [8], mergers of binary white dwarfs [9], flaring stars [10], and short GRBs [11]. The radiation mechanism for the coherent emission is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of the FRBs is currently unknown, with non-cataclysmic models suggesting giant flares from magnetars (see, e.g., Popov & Postnov 2010;Thornton et al 2013;Pen & Connor 2015) and supergiant pulses from extragalactic neutron stars (see, e.g., as possible progenitors. The cataclysmic progenitor theories include NS mergers (Totani 2013) and "blitzars" which occur when a neutron star collapses to a black hole (BH) (Zhang 2014;Falcke & Rezzolla 2014), and the collapse of a strange star crust (Zhang et al 2018). A superluminous supernova interacting with its environment is also proposed as the origin of FRBs (Piro 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%