2019
DOI: 10.3390/w12010132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pump Efficiency Analysis for Proper Energy Assessment in Optimization of Water Supply Systems

Abstract: Water supply systems need to be designed accounting for both construction and operational costs. When the installation requires water pumping, it is key for the operational costs to know how well the pump can perform. So far, pump efficiency has been considered using conservative values, in the absence of a better estimation. The aim of this paper was to improve determining the energy costs by clarifying what the value of the pump performance should be. For this, 226 commercial pumps were studied, registering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a general rule, it was assumed that the larger the pump is, the better performance it had. Nevertheless, Martin-Candilejo et al [32] have addressed this issue in depth concluding that there is a direct relationship between the flow rate and the pump efficiency: The pump efficiency is better for greater discharge flow rates, reaching an asymptote for 90%. Figure 1 is a scheme of the cost distribution depending on the pipe diameter.…”
Section: Total Cost = Pipe Construction + Pumping Station Constructiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a general rule, it was assumed that the larger the pump is, the better performance it had. Nevertheless, Martin-Candilejo et al [32] have addressed this issue in depth concluding that there is a direct relationship between the flow rate and the pump efficiency: The pump efficiency is better for greater discharge flow rates, reaching an asymptote for 90%. Figure 1 is a scheme of the cost distribution depending on the pipe diameter.…”
Section: Total Cost = Pipe Construction + Pumping Station Constructiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of the pump performance µ B , the other variables in the previous equation are actually data: V is the total volume to be pumped, p is the unit price of the energy that has been hired, and f A is calculated from the discount rate i, the service life n U of the water pipeline and the construction period n C . Regarding the engine efficiency µ M , although it varies theoretically depending on the engine model chosen and the operating point of the pump, the variations in engine performance are so small that it can be considered constant across different models and manufacturers [32]. Therefore, the above equation can be simplified by grouping all the data and parameters that have fixed values in the coefficient KC E1 , which can be considered constant for each case analyzed:…”
Section: Optimization For Constant Flow Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These previous antecedents could incentivize researchers such as Casasso et al [3] and Candilejo et al [4] to develop strategies to improve energy efficiency in water infrastructures that include pumping stations. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [5] defined several measures to save energy in pumping stations, such as reduced pressure service, managed pressure service, maximized efficiency of the system, and adequate pump and control modes selections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using more FSPs than the minimum required in the system generates significant benefits in energy costs because pumps improve their efficiency, as was demonstrated by Walsky and Creaco [33]. Later, Candilejo et al [4,34] improved a methodology to estimate pump's performance for a proper design of a pumping station in order to reduce operational costs and then create a methodology for the optimal design of a water pumping system with variable flow rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%