2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist: A 10-Year Institutional Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Flörchinger and coworkers reported 159 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and severe pneumonia; the mean support time was 8.5 days, 30-day mortality was 13.6%, and they concluded that the best indication for use of PECLA was severe hypercapnia and moderate hypoxia. 2 Our patient who had PECLA (case 1) satisfied these indications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 Flörchinger and coworkers reported 159 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and severe pneumonia; the mean support time was 8.5 days, 30-day mortality was 13.6%, and they concluded that the best indication for use of PECLA was severe hypercapnia and moderate hypoxia. 2 Our patient who had PECLA (case 1) satisfied these indications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite these advantages, blood flow is dependent on cardiac output. 2 The PECLA allows lung protective ventilation and improves alveolar gas exchange. Diseased lung sections may have better recovery because mechanical ventilation can be downgraded, and iatrogenic lung injury from barotrauma and volutrauma can be reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, there is good evidence that ECCO 2 R can effectively reduce PaCO 2 and make a small contribution to oxygenation in patients with ARDS. Likewise, studies 14,[18][19][20]22,23 have demonstrated that ECCO 2 R facilitates a lung-protective ventilation strategy by allowing a reduction in tidal volumes and inspiratory airway pressures. ECCO 2 R may even complement specific forms of protective ventilation such as HFOV 21,24 or APRV (Airway Pressure Release Ventilation) with 2-4 mL/kg tidal volumes.…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within these 18 citations, there were no randomised controlled trials, a single health technology assessment 15 and only two prospective interventional studies 10,14 both of which have already been summarised. The remainder of the relevant literature was confined to either prospective or retrospective case series [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] although these do demonstrate that ECCO 2 R has been used on over 500 patients (with no unifying database). Overall, there is good evidence that ECCO 2 R can effectively reduce PaCO 2 and make a small contribution to oxygenation in patients with ARDS.…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%