“…Together with the new approaches of Mintz and others, research into slaves and slavery has seen a blossoming of comparative research and new approaches from the side of culturalistoriented world and global historiography, as well as a series of new research orientations, such as ''racism and slavery'', 47 ''transculturation, diaspora/migration history'', 48 including trans-Atlantic construction of identities, ethnicities, and Atlantic creoles, 49 ''comparative history of slavery'', 50 ''history from below'', not only of slavery as an institution but first of all based on slave voices, life histories, and experiences, including ''abolition and post-emancipation'', 51 ''social history of law and slavery'', 52 ''social history of medicine'' (and sciences in general), 53 as well as international history, microhistory, in particular Atlantic history, history of the seas and migrations, 54 history of slaveries and creolizations in different spaces of the Indian Ocean, 55 or ''translocal/transnational'' cultural history, 56 with the variants of ''new'' imperial history, 57 histories of diasporas, and translocal south-south history. 58 More recently, the themes ''religion and slavery'' (if the slavers were only interested in the bodies of the enslaved, slaves in their agency transcended the individualities of the dead and the ubiquity of death), 59 ''women, children, and slavery'', 60 and ''gender and slavery'' 61 have also begun to play major roles, the high point of research so far (resulting in new criteria of analysis for a genuinely global history of slavery from today's perspective) being the two volumes of Women and Slavery and Children in Slavery. The appearance of Joseph Miller's article of synthesis on this subject is also not accidental.…”