1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)91164-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and Properties of Orotic Acid-decarboxylating Enzymes from Calf Thymus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented here account for the copurification of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and orotidylate decarboxylase and also the greater lability of the phosphoribosyltransferase as previously described for the enzymes from mammalian tissues (Kasbekar et al, 1964;Appel, 1968;Brown et al, 1975;Grobner and Kelley, 1975). The difficulty in separating the two enzyme activities can be compared to the situation in yeast, where the two enzymes are readily separable (Umezu et al, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results presented here account for the copurification of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and orotidylate decarboxylase and also the greater lability of the phosphoribosyltransferase as previously described for the enzymes from mammalian tissues (Kasbekar et al, 1964;Appel, 1968;Brown et al, 1975;Grobner and Kelley, 1975). The difficulty in separating the two enzyme activities can be compared to the situation in yeast, where the two enzymes are readily separable (Umezu et al, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Phosphoribosyltransferase activity was not associated with this form, though it was detected in association with the decarboxylase in a species with a molecular weight of approximately 63 000 (Campbell et al, 1977). Kasbekar et al (1964) have claimed separation of the two enzyme activities by starch gel electrophoresis of the partially purified enzymes from calf thymus. Reyes and Guganig (1975) also obtained an apparent separation of the two enzyme activities on a sucrose gradient following treatment of the phosphoribosyltransferase-decarboxylase complex from murine leukemia P1534J with elastase.2…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This loss of orotate PRTase is not surprising, despite efforts to provide maximal stablizing conditions (Table II). Several workers have demonstrated that the orotate PRTase activity of UMP synthase is far more labile than the OMP decarboxylase activity (Kasbekar et al, 1964;Appel, 1968;Brown et al, 1975;Grobner & Kelley, 1975;Reyes & Guganig, 1975; Kavipurapu & Jones, 1976;Brown & O'-Sullivan, 1977). We feel that the partial loss of orotate PRTase activity results from an abrupt change, induced by the extensive purification of the protein, in the structure of the PRTase domain of UMP synthase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, occasional reports have indicated that the two enzyme activities could be on separate polypeptides. Kasbekar et al (1964) observed that the two activities separated during electrophoresis in a starch gel, although the orotate PRTase activity was frequently lost; Appel (1968) could not recover the transferase activity after electrophoresis. Brown & O '-Sullivan (1977) inferred from experiments on a partially purified protein from human erythrocytes that the orotate PRTase:OMP decarboxylase complex was composed of two subunits (approximately 13 000 daltons) responsible for the orotate PRTase activity plus two subunits (approximately 20 000 daltons) responsible for the OMP decarboxylase activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%