1993
DOI: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90171-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification of a cathepsin L-like proteinase secreted by adult Fasciola hepatica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been demonstrated that F. h e p a tic a shows perm anent turnover of its surface antigens, inducing the formation o f immune com plex pre cipitates on the juvenile fluke surface (Hanna, 1980;Sandeman & Howell, 1980;Glauert et al, 1985 ;Tkalevic et al, 1996) which prevents effector cells adhering to juvenile flukes. F. h e p a tic a excretorysecretory products (FhESP) contain proteolytic enzymes such as cysteine proteases (cathepsin L-like) (Chapman & Mitchell, 1982;Smith et al, 1993a;Smith et al, 1993b) w hich cleave in vitro immunoglobulins and inhibit the in vitro adherence o f eosinophils to juve nile flukes in the presence o f immune serum (Carmona et al, 1993). It has also been observed that flukes migrating in the hepatic parenchyma are covered by IgM (Chauvin & Boulard, 1996), w hen eosinophils do not possess a Fcp-receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been demonstrated that F. h e p a tic a shows perm anent turnover of its surface antigens, inducing the formation o f immune com plex pre cipitates on the juvenile fluke surface (Hanna, 1980;Sandeman & Howell, 1980;Glauert et al, 1985 ;Tkalevic et al, 1996) which prevents effector cells adhering to juvenile flukes. F. h e p a tic a excretorysecretory products (FhESP) contain proteolytic enzymes such as cysteine proteases (cathepsin L-like) (Chapman & Mitchell, 1982;Smith et al, 1993a;Smith et al, 1993b) w hich cleave in vitro immunoglobulins and inhibit the in vitro adherence o f eosinophils to juve nile flukes in the presence o f immune serum (Carmona et al, 1993). It has also been observed that flukes migrating in the hepatic parenchyma are covered by IgM (Chauvin & Boulard, 1996), w hen eosinophils do not possess a Fcp-receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several functions have been suggested for these proteinases, including tissue invasion, feeding and immune evasion [3,32]. In the present work, two cysteine proteinases of 28 and 34 kDa were purified, by means of preparative electrophoresis and electroelution in polyacrylamide gels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There was no significant correlation between anti-P28 or anti-ESP IgG levels and fluke burdens and no differences could be detected between primarily and secondarily infected goats. This similarity may be explained by the fact that the ESP of adult F. hepatica included cysteine proteinases [32], secreted or excreted from the tegument or the gut of the flukes [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las fracciones de pesos moleculares aproximados 27 KDa y 25-26 KDa son de naturaleza proteinasa como catepsina L-like, según el análisis de las secuencias N-terminal, se trata de una de las proteínas más importantes excretadas y secretadas por F. hepatica in vitro y son las moléculas predominantes en un 80%, también se pudo demostrar por microscopía que se encuentran en vesículas a nivel de las células epiteliales del intestino de F. hepatica (13,14) . Si solo nos basaríamos en el peso molecular de la fracción purificada en este trabajo, se podría decir que se trata de la misma proteinasa que tiene mucha importancia en el inmunodiagnóstico de la fascioliasis humana; para demostrar esto es recomendable realizar un trabajo de caracterización molecular y bioquímica de esta fracción; ya que esta proteinasa, catepsina L-like, se usa en otros países en pruebas de ELISA y Western Blot, obteniéndose buenos resultados y que ahora podrían ser utilizados como una proteína de importancia inmunodiagnóstica (15)(16)(17) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified