Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
A case study is presented involving Noble Energy Mississippi Canyon Deepwater (DW) Gulf of Mexico frac packs performed over the last 5-years. This paper describes the role that proppant tracers and gravel pack (GP) logs played in improving operations, ensuring a complete annular pack, evaluating frac pack (FP) efficiency, and providing data for decision making as well as identification of best practices. Eight (8) DW completions involving thirteen (13) FP treatments and an associated seventeen (17) GP logs have been performed over the last 5-years in water depths ranging from 4,000 to 7,000-ft and reservoir intervals between 15,000 and 27,000-ft with pore pressures between 10.5 and 14.1-ppg. Proppant tracers and GP logs were utilized to confirm GP integrity, assist in reservoir performance evaluation, help guide start-up procedures, and serve as reference information for creating best practices in the operator's FP designs. The proppant tracers were injected into the proppant slurries from the start of proppant addition until screen-out. In most cases, washpipe-deployed spectral gamma ray and gamma density logging tools were then pulled across the completion interval as the washpipe was pulled out of the hole to record the frac coverage and annular pack quality. In cases in which a re-log or re-frac was performed, the logging tools were deployed via slickline. Seventeen (17) logs were evaluated and categorized in this paper to demonstrate the benefits gained. Some cases are limited to observations only (within the limits of the gamma ray tools, without final understanding of the why or how). However, on two (2) occasions, the logs identified that the gravel pack tools had failed and/or that there was no annular pack achieved. Both zones were re-stimulated and re-logged which confirmed annular GP integrity. Both wells are currently producing without compromise to productivity, flux limit or any detrimental sand control issues. If the logs had not been run and evaluated, both wells likely would have failed, losing either the lower or both the lower and upper intervals. On two (2) other occasions, voids were identified in the gravel packed intervals. In the first instance, the log was re-run after the upper completion (10-days later), and the pack had settled, eliminating the void. This information saved the operator from an unnecessary wellbore intervention ($10 MM+), allowing the ramp of the well to maximum design rate without otherwise imposed constraints. It also provided the confidence to move ahead on the subsequent instance where a void was identified. The results and the learnings presented in this paper can assist others in the industry when similar challenges are faced. Deepwater completions must be productive and reliable. Proppant tracing and gravel pack logging can assist the operator in real-time operational decision making, production start-up procedures, and future completion design modifications, to ensure that maximum benefit is realized from the sand control treatment. This is another useful tool that every completion program needs in order to ensure success and avoid preventable failures.
A case study is presented involving Noble Energy Mississippi Canyon Deepwater (DW) Gulf of Mexico frac packs performed over the last 5-years. This paper describes the role that proppant tracers and gravel pack (GP) logs played in improving operations, ensuring a complete annular pack, evaluating frac pack (FP) efficiency, and providing data for decision making as well as identification of best practices. Eight (8) DW completions involving thirteen (13) FP treatments and an associated seventeen (17) GP logs have been performed over the last 5-years in water depths ranging from 4,000 to 7,000-ft and reservoir intervals between 15,000 and 27,000-ft with pore pressures between 10.5 and 14.1-ppg. Proppant tracers and GP logs were utilized to confirm GP integrity, assist in reservoir performance evaluation, help guide start-up procedures, and serve as reference information for creating best practices in the operator's FP designs. The proppant tracers were injected into the proppant slurries from the start of proppant addition until screen-out. In most cases, washpipe-deployed spectral gamma ray and gamma density logging tools were then pulled across the completion interval as the washpipe was pulled out of the hole to record the frac coverage and annular pack quality. In cases in which a re-log or re-frac was performed, the logging tools were deployed via slickline. Seventeen (17) logs were evaluated and categorized in this paper to demonstrate the benefits gained. Some cases are limited to observations only (within the limits of the gamma ray tools, without final understanding of the why or how). However, on two (2) occasions, the logs identified that the gravel pack tools had failed and/or that there was no annular pack achieved. Both zones were re-stimulated and re-logged which confirmed annular GP integrity. Both wells are currently producing without compromise to productivity, flux limit or any detrimental sand control issues. If the logs had not been run and evaluated, both wells likely would have failed, losing either the lower or both the lower and upper intervals. On two (2) other occasions, voids were identified in the gravel packed intervals. In the first instance, the log was re-run after the upper completion (10-days later), and the pack had settled, eliminating the void. This information saved the operator from an unnecessary wellbore intervention ($10 MM+), allowing the ramp of the well to maximum design rate without otherwise imposed constraints. It also provided the confidence to move ahead on the subsequent instance where a void was identified. The results and the learnings presented in this paper can assist others in the industry when similar challenges are faced. Deepwater completions must be productive and reliable. Proppant tracing and gravel pack logging can assist the operator in real-time operational decision making, production start-up procedures, and future completion design modifications, to ensure that maximum benefit is realized from the sand control treatment. This is another useful tool that every completion program needs in order to ensure success and avoid preventable failures.
As shallower reservoirs deplete, the search for hydrocarbons is going deeper in the Gulf of Mexico. These reservoirs generally have lower permeability than many of the shallower reservoirs and require massive hydraulic fractures to reach economical production rates.1–4 The reservoirs are generally over-pressured and can require heavy weight drilling and completion fluids for well control. Fracturing fluids are often weighted, with viscosity and friction that require customization to the long work strings to permit sufficient rates to effectively fracture the formation. The lower permeability in these reservoirs require massive volumes of proppant to achieve the desired fracture lengths and conductivities, which can lead to erosional and logistics issues. As drawdowns greater than 10,000 psi are planned early in these wells’ lives, the pumping schedules need to consider the effects of increased stress on the proppant and possible future fracture conductivity loss. Descriptions of these issues along with discussions of current and proposed future solutions are provided.
As many of the shallow, higher perm reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico deplete, wells are being drilled deeper into more challenging high-pressure, low permeability reservoirs. Casing and work-string sizes are also being downsized to reduce costs. This presents a challenge as many of these lower permeability reservoirs cannot be produced economically without a hydraulic fracture completion. To lower surface treating pressures to levels that can be managed within current frac boat and surface iron limits, heavy weight brines are often used as the base fluid for these frac gels. These fluids use the extra hydrostatic pressure of the brine to lower the surface treating pressure.1,2,3 However, some of the hydrostatic advantage from the brine density of these fluids is lost due to the additional friction caused by this same increase in density. This friction increase has been previously documented, and the precise magnitude of the increase has been discussed in several publications. Limited full-scale test data exists on the actual friction increase verses hydrostatic pressure for many of these fluids. Pre-job estimates from service providers indicate that there is a lack of understanding on the effects of high-density brines to the friction pressure of crosslinked gels. This is due to the excessive cost of full-scale testing, the limited market for these fluids, and the wide variations in deep-water well architecture. In this study, actual frac job data is analyzed from 30 frac stages in eight different wells with similar measured depths, true vertical depths, and work-string configurations. Five different base brine densities were used in these wells, with the work split between two service providers. The base brine density ranged from 8.7 to 12.5 ppg. Many of these wells incorporated bottom hole gauges to allow for a more accurate calculation of friction pressure during the treatments. The following analysis compares the expected surface treating pressure with the observed treating pressure at varying rates and proppant concentrations throughout these fracture treatments. This comparison will also provide the observed increase in friction pressure against the hydrostatic benefit for these fluids. The results indicate that the use of expensive high-density brines as the base fluid for frac gels may not provide the expected reduction in surface treating pressure. A simple mathematical model was built using an empirical correlation of the measured data to aid in the design of future wells. This analysis should be beneficial to both service company providers and completions engineer end users. The results should be used to manage the expectations in the use of weighed frac fluids. The data suggests that the friction increase when using brines with a density greater than approximately 11 ppg as the base fluid for frac gels exceeds the hydrostatic benefit. At brine densities greater than 12 ppg, the study indicates that a standard 6% NaCl frac fluid would have a lower surface treating pressure for the given well depth and selected work strings. It is expected that this analysis will encourage future data gathering and testing for these fluids as their use increases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.