2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jatis.5.3.035003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pushing the limits of the coronagraphic occulters on Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph

Abstract: The Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) contains the only currently operating coronagraph in space that is not trained on the Sun. In an era of extreme-adaptiveoptics-fed coronagraphs, and with the possibility of future space-based coronagraphs, we re-evaluate the contrast performance of the STIS CCD camera. The 50CORON aperture consists of a series of occulting wedges and bars, including the recently commissioned BAR5 occulter. We discuss the latest procedures in obtaining… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming gray scattering for the dust in the ring seen with the NICMOS F110W filter and GPI H band, the NICMOS-NMF result will produce surface brightnesses of ∼2.2 and ∼1.0 mJy arcsec −2 , respectively. Therefore, even the disk is not removed by the reduction methods; it is below a detection threshold of 1σ (which corresponds to a total S/N of 5 for extended structure spanning ∼25 pixels; Debes et al 2019). In this way, its detectability is beyond the limit of the current methods with the current GPI H-band PSF library.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming gray scattering for the dust in the ring seen with the NICMOS F110W filter and GPI H band, the NICMOS-NMF result will produce surface brightnesses of ∼2.2 and ∼1.0 mJy arcsec −2 , respectively. Therefore, even the disk is not removed by the reduction methods; it is below a detection threshold of 1σ (which corresponds to a total S/N of 5 for extended structure spanning ∼25 pixels; Debes et al 2019). In this way, its detectability is beyond the limit of the current methods with the current GPI H-band PSF library.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pivot wavelength of STIS is 0.58 μm 12 (wavelength range: 0.2-1.1 μm) and the pixel size is 0 05072 (Riley 2018). In each visit, to obtain the best angular coverage, we use the mutually nearly perpendicular WEDGEA1.0 and the BAR5 occulters: the former offers an inner working angle (IWA) of 0 5, the latter 0 2 (Debes et al 2019). In each TWA 7 visit, there are 6 of 146.6 s readouts using BAR5, and 2 of 640.0 s readouts or 2 of 700.0 s readouts using WEDGEA1.0.…”
Section: Hst/stis (2019)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first demonstrate the DI-sNMF method using RDI post-processing of a point source. We use the Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/STIS coronagraphic imaging observations of HD 38393 behind the BAR5 occulter (Schneider et al 2017;Debes et al 2019) for this purpose. HD 38393 was visited with 9 orbits during HST Cycle 23 (Proposal ID: 14426, PI: J. Debes), each with a distinct telescope orientation and a 3×3 sub-pixel dithering pattern.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We repeat the above procedure 3 times for a planet at different brightness levels-one that is as bright as the speckles (i.e., in the 3×3 pixel box, the total planet signal is equal to the total speckle signal), and two that are either 10 or 0.1 times of that. For the results obtained from all the reduction methods, we measure the brightness of the point source following Debes et al (2019): we first integrate over the 3×3 pixel box for the element-wise median of the 90 PSFsubtracted images, then subtract that value by 9 times the median of the surrounding pixel values (that are within 2 and 4 pixels from the point source center) to remove the background. We calculate a conservative uncertainty 4 by taking the square root of the quadratic sum of the element-wise standard deviation of the 90 PSF-subtracted images in the 3×3 pixel box.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%