Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender &Amp; IT - GenderIT '18 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3196839.3196845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping

Abstract: Prior work examining technology usage and maintenance practices in homes describes division of labor in terms of technical expertise. In this paper, we offer a counter-narrative to this explanation for engagement with Ubiquitous Computing. Using feminist theory as an analytic lens, we examine how gender identity work is a determining factor of whether and how people engage with digital technologies in their homes. We present a model of gender & technical identity co-construction. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this resulted in the robot "banging on the door because it's charged itself and it's ready to go back to work." In this and other ways, participants described the need to undertake additional 'digital housekeeping' [65,77,81] to supervise the robotic vacuum, despite the associated reduction in physical labor required to clean foors. Ken explained the work involved as follows:…”
Section: Vacuumingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this resulted in the robot "banging on the door because it's charged itself and it's ready to go back to work." In this and other ways, participants described the need to undertake additional 'digital housekeeping' [65,77,81] to supervise the robotic vacuum, despite the associated reduction in physical labor required to clean foors. Ken explained the work involved as follows:…”
Section: Vacuumingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gibson and colleagues have used the concept of bricolage to account for the ways in which people use non-conventional tools or methods to adapt old and new technologies to their own everyday health needs and preferences (Gibson et al, 2013). Beyond healthcare, studies of smart home technologies originating from the social sciences and HCI emphasise how people seek ‘small conveniences’ (Strengers et al, 2019), ‘aesthetic pleasures’ (Strengers and Nicholls, 2018), greater control over their routines and lives (Hargreaves and Wilson, 2017), a more modern lifestyle (Mennicken and Huang, 2012), experimentation, tinkering and ‘hacking’ opportunities (Mennicken and Huang, 2012; Rode and Poole, 2018; Strengers and Nicholls, 2018) or ‘protection, productivity and pleasure’ (Strengers et al, 2019).…”
Section: Approaching Older People and Smart Home Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of the design process, Tolmie et al (2007) argue that digital housekeeping is the ‘work to make the home network work’. Rode and Poole (2018) argue that generally, studies on technology maintenance practices in the household do not consider the role of gender. However, the examples of scholarship that consider gendered dimensions emphasise how the labour associated with digital technologies can be a form of expertise that is unevenly distributed in the home.…”
Section: ‘Digital Housekeeping’ and Gendered Divisions Of Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%