2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2658-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyramids of QTLs enhance host–plant resistance and Bt-mediated resistance to leaf-chewing insects in soybean

Abstract: Key messageQTL-M and QTL-E enhance soybean resistance to insects. Pyramiding these QTLs withcry1Ac increases protection against Bt-tolerant pests, presenting an opportunity to effectively deploy Bt with host–plant resistance genes.AbstractPlant resistance to leaf-chewing insects minimizes the need for insecticide applications, reducing crop production costs and pesticide concerns. In soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], resistance to a broad range of leaf-chewing insects is found in PI 229358 and PI 227687. PI 22… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…& Gerd.) (quantitative), and leaf-chewing insects (quantitative) (Dorrance et al, 2008;Shi et al, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Ajayi-Oyetunde et al, 2016;Ortega et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…& Gerd.) (quantitative), and leaf-chewing insects (quantitative) (Dorrance et al, 2008;Shi et al, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Ajayi-Oyetunde et al, 2016;Ortega et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotation to nonhost crops such as corn (Zea mays L.) can be a means of SCN control; however, this method does not completely eradicate the pathogen from the soil due to SCN's ability to overwinter in soil for several years (Porter et al, 2001;Jackson et al, 2005;Miller et al, 2006). Nematicide seed treatments have recently been made available to producers, but they need to be combined with genetic resistance to protect yields (Tylka et al, 2015;Tenuta and Tenuta, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In soybean, wild relative PI 171444 (MG VI) was found to be the majorly resistant and exhibited antixenosis, antibiosis, and temporal separation (Kester et al 1984), and the lines PI 229358, PI 227687, and PI 274454 expressed antixenosistype resistance against Anticarsia gemmatalis (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Hoffmann-Campo et Ortega et al 2016) PI 227687 also provoked repellency to Trichoplusia ni caterpillars and adults of Epilachna varivestis, verified for the presence of volatile derivatives of their leaves (Liu et al 1989). PI 567336A and PI 567598B were confirmed as the most resistant wild relatives and were characterized as having antibiosis resistance to kudzu bug (KZB), Megacopta punctatissima Montandon (Bray et al 2016).…”
Section: Wild Relatives As Sources Of Resistance To Insect Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. nakashimae has been used to develop an interspecific linkage map with V. umbellata (Somta et al 2006). QTL-M and QTL-E enhance soybean resistance to major insects; pyramiding these QTLs with cry1Ac increases protection against Bt-tolerant pests, presenting an opportunity to effectively deploy Bt with host plant resistance genes (Ortega et al 2016).…”
Section: Marker-assisted Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GP‐406, PI 679959; QTL‐M, QTL‐G, QTL‐H, and QTL‐E) are highly resistant to CEW, SBL, VBC, and fall armyworm [FAW, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)] (Ortega et al, 2016). Pyramiding two insect resistance loci (i.e., QTL‐M and QTL‐E) is feasible in a breeding program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%