2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.10.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidines: Discovery and preliminary SAR of a novel series of DYRK1B and DYRK1A inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the potent and previously unrecognized splicing kinase inhibitory activity of these drugs against this kinase panel, we also decided to investigate the activity of other known splicing kinase inhibitory drugs and tool compounds that were not included in the initial TESLR screen. To this end we performed a dose-response screen with Mirk-IN-1 (a known DYRK1A inhibitor), (Anderson, Chen et al 2013) Sphinx31 (a selective SRPK1 inhibitor) (Batson, Toop et al 2017) dinaciclib (a FDA designated orphan drug and a potent CDK 1, 2, 5, and 9 inhibitor), (Paruch, Dwyer et al 2010) SRPIN340 (SRPK 1 and 2 inhibitor), (Karakama, Sakamoto et al 2010) SNS-032 (CDK 2,7 and 9 inhibitor), (Ma and Cress 2007) flavopiridol (Alvocidib, a FDA designated orphan drug and a potent pan-CDK inhibitor), (Senderowicz 1999) palbociclib (a non-selective CDK/multi-kinase inhibitor that is a FDA designated orphan drug), (Klaeger, Heinzlmeir et al 2017) and silmitasertib (a CK2 inhibitor in Phase II). (Kim, Choi et al 2014) Of these compounds we found that only Mirk-IN-1, palbociclib and silmitasertib were active (IC50s in the range of 10-300 µM) in the TESLR assay, while the other splicing kinase inhibitors showed IC50s >> 10 µM in inducing triple exon skipping (see SI; Figure S4).…”
Section: Focused Screening Of Selective Tool Compounds and Kinase Inhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potent and previously unrecognized splicing kinase inhibitory activity of these drugs against this kinase panel, we also decided to investigate the activity of other known splicing kinase inhibitory drugs and tool compounds that were not included in the initial TESLR screen. To this end we performed a dose-response screen with Mirk-IN-1 (a known DYRK1A inhibitor), (Anderson, Chen et al 2013) Sphinx31 (a selective SRPK1 inhibitor) (Batson, Toop et al 2017) dinaciclib (a FDA designated orphan drug and a potent CDK 1, 2, 5, and 9 inhibitor), (Paruch, Dwyer et al 2010) SRPIN340 (SRPK 1 and 2 inhibitor), (Karakama, Sakamoto et al 2010) SNS-032 (CDK 2,7 and 9 inhibitor), (Ma and Cress 2007) flavopiridol (Alvocidib, a FDA designated orphan drug and a potent pan-CDK inhibitor), (Senderowicz 1999) palbociclib (a non-selective CDK/multi-kinase inhibitor that is a FDA designated orphan drug), (Klaeger, Heinzlmeir et al 2017) and silmitasertib (a CK2 inhibitor in Phase II). (Kim, Choi et al 2014) Of these compounds we found that only Mirk-IN-1, palbociclib and silmitasertib were active (IC50s in the range of 10-300 µM) in the TESLR assay, while the other splicing kinase inhibitors showed IC50s >> 10 µM in inducing triple exon skipping (see SI; Figure S4).…”
Section: Focused Screening Of Selective Tool Compounds and Kinase Inhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivative was published as a Dyrk1B inhibitor; however it was three times more potent toward Dyrk1A and also inhibited microtubule affinity–regulating kinase (MARK)1 in a small counter screen [32]. This series was extended in a recent report, however, selectivity data or evidence for an inhibition of the target kinases in cells were not provided [61]. Some acridine analogs were found to potently inhibit Dyrk2, with only few kinases being affected outside the CMGC family [62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1C). The free space was occupied by the other DYRK1A inhibitor pyrido [2,3-d]pyrimidine inhibitor, 20 and partly by leucettine L41 21 (Fig. S1), indicating that this space is available for structural modification of INDY.…”
Section: Structural Modification Of Indy Based On the Crystal Structumentioning
confidence: 95%