1966
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-196603000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrophosphate as a Source of Phosphorus for Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a given soil type, points appended by the same letter are not significantly different ( (Gilliam 1970;Khasawneh et al 1979;Miner and Kamprath 1971;Parent et al 1985), except where hydrolysis rates were inhibited causing a suppression in P availability from pP (Sutton et al 1966;Sutton and Larsen 1964). The study presented here also found no significant difference, over the time period investigated, in total isotopically exchangeable P where P was supplied as pP as compared to oP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Within a given soil type, points appended by the same letter are not significantly different ( (Gilliam 1970;Khasawneh et al 1979;Miner and Kamprath 1971;Parent et al 1985), except where hydrolysis rates were inhibited causing a suppression in P availability from pP (Sutton et al 1966;Sutton and Larsen 1964). The study presented here also found no significant difference, over the time period investigated, in total isotopically exchangeable P where P was supplied as pP as compared to oP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The distinguishing feature of this isotopic study is that it had the capability to chemically assess the importance of the contribution of both hydrolysed and non-hydrolysed pP to total isotopically exchangeable P. Previous studies often concluded, based on less sophisticated techniques that the reason pP was equivalent to oP as a P source for crops is because the biological and chemical environment in soil caused pP to rapidly hydrolyse to oP. Sutton and Larsen (1964) concluded that the amount of P available to crops, when supplied as pP, was essentially controlled by the partitioning of pP onto the solid phase prior to hydrolysis. Any adsorbed pP was assumed to be non-hydrolysable and consequently non-available, and any soil solution phase pP was presumed to rapidly hydrolyse to oP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fluid ammonium polyphosphate was developed in the 1950's as an alternative form of P fertiliser. Fluid forms of P had gained little market acceptance as the majority of the studies, which were conducted in the USA in the 1960's and 1970's (Sutton and Larsen 1963;Khasawneh et al, 1974;Sample et al, 1979) did not reveal any particular advantages of using the higher-priced fluid versus granular formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%