2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11908-012-0264-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q Fever Endocarditis: Does Serology Predict Outcome?

Abstract: Q fever is an ubiquitous zoonosis caused by Coxiella burneti, an intracellular bacterium that can produce acute or chronic infections in humans. These forms are characterized by different evolution, serological profile and treatment that must be very long to achieve a cure in chronic forms. However, the serological profile for diagnosis and the real value of serology for predicting outcome are controversial, and management dilemmas for many patients with Q fever infection are continuously emerging. In this art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on risk for further relapse especially in this patient following valve replacement lifelong therapy could be considered [8]. Long-term clinical and serological follow-up is necessary and cessation of therapy depending on serological markers is possible although proof of a better outcome with this approach has not been shown so far [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on risk for further relapse especially in this patient following valve replacement lifelong therapy could be considered [8]. Long-term clinical and serological follow-up is necessary and cessation of therapy depending on serological markers is possible although proof of a better outcome with this approach has not been shown so far [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the use of serologic titers in distinguishing the stage of disease or outcome is problematic. They are also not a useful tool for deciding the duration of treatment [15] . Shortcomings of serologic testing and culture as well as prolonged turn around times for these tests highlights the potential benefit of PCR on pathologic specimens [2] , [5] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%