2013
DOI: 10.1080/17445760.2012.658802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QMDS: a file system metadata management service supporting a graph data model-based query language

Abstract: File system metadata management has become a bottleneck for many data-intensive applications that rely on high-performance file systems. Part of the bottleneck is due to the limitations of an almost 50 year old interface standard with metadata abstractions that were designed at a time when high-end file systems managed less than 100MB. Today's highperformance file systems store 7 to 9 orders of magnitude more data, resulting in numbers of data items for which these metadata abstractions are inadequate, such as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative post-hierarchical file system architectures have been proposed (Gi ord et al, 1991;Dekeyser et al, 2008;A. Ames et al, 2005;S. Ames et al, 2013;Seltzer & Murphy, 2009;Rizzo, 2004;Padioleau, Sigonneau, & Ridoux, 2006) to avoid the problems posed by traditional file systems.…”
Section: Replacing Hierarchal File Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative post-hierarchical file system architectures have been proposed (Gi ord et al, 1991;Dekeyser et al, 2008;A. Ames et al, 2005;S. Ames et al, 2013;Seltzer & Murphy, 2009;Rizzo, 2004;Padioleau, Sigonneau, & Ridoux, 2006) to avoid the problems posed by traditional file systems.…”
Section: Replacing Hierarchal File Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these proposals rely on a rich collection of file metadata rather than the hierarchical directory structure (A. Ames et al, 2005;S. Ames, Gokhale, & Maltzahn, 2013;Dekeyser, Watson, & Motrøn, 2008;Gi ord, Jouvelot, Sheldon, et al, 1991;Rizzo, 2004;Seltzer & Murphy, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of query languages either directly represent or can be used for property graphs [32]. These languages include SPARQL [33] for RDF data [34], GraphGrep for regular expression queries in graphs [35], Cypher for Neo4j graph databases [36], Gremlin from the Thinkerpop project [37], specific query language for provenance [38], Quasar for QMDS [39], and SQL (SemiJoin) for relational databases [40,41,42]. Among these languages, previous research [43] suggests that a low-level language such as Gremlin provides better performance because it allows users to manually control each traversal step in detail.…”
Section: Traversal Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table discounts, among others, the "relationships" dimension; however, several proposals (LIFS [3,4], MDFS [10], and QMDS [5]) are focused precisely on that dimension.…”
Section: Mapping Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposals that have attempted to replace hierarchical directory structures altogether [3,5,7,10,12,17,19,24,26], in favour of relying on rich collections of metadata, can also be mapped in terms of their particular choices.…”
Section: Mapping Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%