2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2011.5963296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoE-Based Cross-Layer Optimization of Wireless Video with Unperceivable Temporal Video Quality Fluctuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, for the case with one dominant interfering base station (BS 1 ) to the video user and assuming fixed channel gains, PLR can be written as (11). If the video user experiences interference from multiple independent bursty interferers, the burstiness and hence the PLR at α i = 1 is expected to decrease.…”
Section: A Unicast Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, for the case with one dominant interfering base station (BS 1 ) to the video user and assuming fixed channel gains, PLR can be written as (11). If the video user experiences interference from multiple independent bursty interferers, the burstiness and hence the PLR at α i = 1 is expected to decrease.…”
Section: A Unicast Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal quality fluctuations were incorporated in utility function for resource allocation in [11]. A general network utilization maximization framework to incorporate the variations in utility functions was proposed in [12].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Wireless Network [12], [26], [27], [28] [18], [19] [20], [29], [30] Next Generation Network [15] [22]…”
Section: Research Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], a scheduling algorithm is proposed to deal with real-time and non-realtime traffic in a proportional fair manner. More recent works [23][24][25][26][27][28] propose QoE-aware schedulers whose aim is to optimize the overall QoE while ensuring a minimum QoE for all users. All of them decide the exact resources assigned to every single user in real time, which makes them suitable for minimum QoS/QoE assurance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%