2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops 2012
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2012.6477781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoE-based performance evaluation of scheduling algorithms over LTE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the scheduling algorithm must also consider fairness and QoS requirements of users' service. Previous works in [13]- [16] investigated the influence of several scheduling algorithms with variety designs intended to improve the data rate, fairness, and QoS in the downlink LTE system.…”
Section: A Lte Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the scheduling algorithm must also consider fairness and QoS requirements of users' service. Previous works in [13]- [16] investigated the influence of several scheduling algorithms with variety designs intended to improve the data rate, fairness, and QoS in the downlink LTE system.…”
Section: A Lte Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [20] investigated and evaluated the performance of three popular LTE downlink schedulers (proportional fairness (PF), exponential proportional fairness (EXP-PF), and modified largest weight delay first (M-LWDF)) for VoIP applications. In [21], the packet scheduling procedure is divided into time and frequency domain.…”
Section: Proposed Qoe-oriented Scheduling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [21] show that MLWDF provides better QoS and Quality of Experience (QoE) than other scheduling algorithms in terms of packet loss ratio and delay. In [22], an MLWDF based joint scheduling has been proposed with multiple traffic classes, where the priority of traffic class and waiting time in the queue of each packet are considered. Although the authors assume that the average SINR for each user is the same, they also ignore the Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) feedback.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLWDF scheduling algorithm has been studied in [20][21][22] to analyze the performance and maximize the QoS of cell user. A delay priority based algorithm is used in [20] where the user gets higher priority if the packet delay is close to the threshold for real-time data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%