QoS awareness support in Web-Service semantics

Tsesmetzis, Dimitrios; Roussaki, Ioanna; Papaioannou, Ioannis; Anagnostou, Miltiades E.

doi:10.1109/aict-iciw.2006.156

Cited by 37 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To a lesser extent, also Yeom et al [40], Tsesmetzis et al [41], [42] , E. Maximilien and P. Singh [27], Guimarães [43], and Soomro and Song [44] (with 2 proposals each). It is worth to clarify that this analysis is scoped to the relationship between the quality models in the field of web services.…”

Section: Some Relevant Observations Followmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Maintainability is only explicitly defined in 17% of the quality models, and partially supported in 19%. The partial coverage is mainly due to the modifiability subcharacteristic which is also partially covered by the stability/change cycle quality attribute [8], [26], [27], [41] (see Table 10). Portability is partially covered in nearly half of the presented quality models due to the adaptability subcharacteristic, which is partially covered by the scalability quality attribute that appears in a few proposals [26]- [28], [38] (see Table 11).…”

Section: Which Quality Factors Are the Most Addressed In The Quality mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality models for web services: A systematic mapping

Oriol

Marco

Franch

2014

Information and Software Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Quality of Service (QoS) is a major issue in various web service related activities. Quality models have been proposed as the engineering artefact to provide a common framework of understanding for QoS, by defining the quality factors that apply to web service usage. Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the current state of the art of the proposed quality models for web services, specifically: (1) which are these proposals and how are they related; (2) what are their structural characteristics; (3) what quality factors are the most and least addressed; and (4) what are their most consolidated definitions. Method: We have conducted a systematic mapping by defining a robust protocol that combines automatic and manual searches from different sources. We used a rigorous method to elicitate the keywords from the research questions and a selection criteria to retrieve the final papers to evaluate. We have adopted the ISO/IEC 25010 standard to articulate our analysis. Results: We have evaluated 47 different quality models from 65 papers that fulfilled the selection criteria. By analyzing in depth these quality models, we have: 1) distributed the proposals along the time dimension and identified their relationships; 2) analysed their size (visualizing the number of nodes and levels) and definition coverage (as indicator of quality of the proposals); 3) quantified the coverage of the different ISO/IEC 25010 quality factors by the proposals; 4) identified the quality factors that appeared in at least 30% of the surveyed proposals and provided the most consolidated definitions for them. Conclusions: We believe that this panoramic view on the anatomy of the quality models for web services may be a good reference for prospective researchers and practitioners in the field and especially may help avoiding the definition of new proposals that do not align with current research.

show abstract

Section: Some Relevant Observations Followmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Which Quality Factors Are the Most Addressed In The Quality mentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality models for web services: A systematic mapping

Oriol

Marco

Franch

2014

Information and Software Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They did not tend to present a practical approach for real services selection. In [11] and [17], the authors focused on the creation of QoS ontology models, which proposed QoS ontology frameworks aimed at formally describing arbitrary QoS parameters. Additionally, [7] and [9] attempted to conduct a proper evaluation framework and proposed QoS-based service selection, despite the authors failing to present how to validate the effectiveness of such a framework or algorithm.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The system will identify thecapability and performance of the service providers so as to enhance the service composition for service clients over the real distributed service network. Due to the complexity of QoS metrics [10,17], a well-defined QoS service description does not actually exist. With a P2P architecture, the QoS is gauged by a service client through cooperative interactions with other peers that can potentially provide the service.…”

Section: Figure1 the P2p Multi Agent Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An MAS-Based Implementation for Semantic Web Services Composition

Shen

Beydoun

Low

2013

Information Systems Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many information system developers face high cost in adopting service-oriented architectures because of the high cost of locating appropriate services to customise and integrate into their system. This chapter aims at reducing this cost by automating much of the composition and service selection effort. It illustrates the use of a peer-to-peer multi-agent system (MAS) to facilitate service selection with multiple quality of service properties. The system will use semantic enrichment of services in order to facilitate their identification and composition. With semantic-driven composition, services can be shared between teams of developers and across multiple organisations connected via the Internet. In this chapter, we focus on a conceptual framework for peer selection with a preliminary mathematical model and a selection process, so as to enhance the P2P-based service coordination system and its components. Abstract. Many information systems developers face high cost in adopting service oriented architectures because of the high cost of locating appropriate services to customise and integrate into their system. This paper aims at reducing this cost by automating much of the composition and service selection effort. It illustrates the use of a Peer-Peer multi agent system (MAS) to facilitate service selection with multiple Quality of Service properties. The system will use semantic enrichment of services in order to facilitate their identification and composition. With semantic driven composition, services can be shared between teams of developers and across multiple organisations connected via the Internet. In this paper, we focus on a conceptual framework for peer selection with a preliminary mathematical model and a selection process, so as to enhance the P2P-based service coordination system and its components.

show abstract

AMPol-Q: Adaptive Middleware Policy to Support QoS

Afandi

Gunter

2006

Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

QoS awareness support in Web-Service semantics

Cited by 37 publications

References 10 publications

Quality models for web services: A systematic mapping

Quality models for web services: A systematic mapping

An MAS-Based Implementation for Semantic Web Services Composition

AMPol-Q: Adaptive Middleware Policy to Support QoS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About