2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12900-019-0103-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QRNAS: software tool for refinement of nucleic acid structures

Abstract: BackgroundComputational models of RNA 3D structure often present various inaccuracies caused by simplifications used in structure prediction methods, such as template-based modeling or coarse-grained simulations. To obtain a high-quality model, the preliminary RNA structural model needs to be refined, taking into account atomic interactions. The goal of the refinement is not only to improve the local quality of the model but to bring it globally closer to the true structure.ResultsWe present QRNAS, a software … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 1000 best-scored conformations for each segment, all-atom models were generated and their conformational details were refined by running 5000 steps of a steepest-descent minimization with QRNAS ( 36 ) which is an extension of the AMBER simulation method ( 37 ) with additional restraints. For each of the 1000 models, the secondary structure was extracted by running ClaRNA ( 38 ) and the set of 1000 secondary structures was used to generate the consensus structure for each segment, to aid in the data visualization and for comparison with the secondary structure used as restraints.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 1000 best-scored conformations for each segment, all-atom models were generated and their conformational details were refined by running 5000 steps of a steepest-descent minimization with QRNAS ( 36 ) which is an extension of the AMBER simulation method ( 37 ) with additional restraints. For each of the 1000 models, the secondary structure was extracted by running ClaRNA ( 38 ) and the set of 1000 secondary structures was used to generate the consensus structure for each segment, to aid in the data visualization and for comparison with the secondary structure used as restraints.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SimRNA employs a statistical potential to approximate the energy using additional restraints on the secondary structure taken from miRBase database (52). Finally, the best-scoring model from SimRNA was optimized in the full-atom representation with QRNAS (53). The starting model of the wt33 peptide was generated based on the crystal structure of the TAV2b/siRNA complex (PDB ID: 2ZI0) (37).…”
Section: Modeling Of Wt33 Peptide and Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the results for both SimRNA and HNADOCK may be further improved with more accurate RNA secondary structure or interaction predictions. The HNADOCK models may also be further optimized by using NA refinement tools like QRNAS (49) or RNAfitme (50) to correct the errors introduced by low resolution modeling and/or rigid docking methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%