2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1533-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QTL analysis of root-lesion nematode resistance in barley: 1. Pratylenchus neglectus

Abstract: The root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus neglectus can cause severe losses in barley cultivation. Multiplication rates had been found to vary greatly between different barley accessions. Two winter barley cultivars, Igri and Franka, had been found to differ in their ability to resist this parasite. An existing Igri × Franka doubled haploid population was chosen to genetically map resistance genes after artificial inoculation with P. neglectus in the greenhouse and climate chamber. A continuous phenotypic variatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, genetic analysis has lead to the identification of five resistance QTL in wheat [14,15] and also in barley [16] but no resistance or tolerance QTL to this pathogen has been described in legumes. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a genetic locus linked to P. neglectus tolerance in a legume species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, genetic analysis has lead to the identification of five resistance QTL in wheat [14,15] and also in barley [16] but no resistance or tolerance QTL to this pathogen has been described in legumes. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a genetic locus linked to P. neglectus tolerance in a legume species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening for response to soil-borne pathogens can be time-consuming and variable (Schneebeli et al 2016; Sharma et al 2011; Smiley and Patterson 1996); therefore, the phenotyping assays included several susceptible and resistant checks (Table 1). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotyping is time-consuming and difficult, and subject to spatial and environmental variation in the field (Collard et al 2005; Schmidt et al 2005; Schneebeli et al 2016; Sharma et al 2011). Often, the identified resistant or partial-resistant germplasm have been wild relatives, landraces, and synthetic hexaploids that also possess nondesirable traits (Li et al 2010; Mahoney et al 2016; Thompson et al 1999, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Host resistance to Pratylenchus spp. is often limited, and only a few loci have been linked to resistance/tolerance to RLN, such as in wheat (Jayatilake et al 2013;Williams et al 2002), barley (Sharma et al 2011), or Medicago littoralis (Oldach et al 2014). Application of chemicals to control RLN is not a sustainable option, as most of these chemicals increase production costs and present negative effects on the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%