2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quad-Networks: Unsupervised Learning to Rank for Interest Point Detection

Abstract: Several machine learning tasks require to represent the data using only a sparse set of interest points. An ideal detector is able to find the corresponding interest points even if the data undergo a transformation typical for a given domain. Since the task is of high practical interest in computer vision, many hand-crafted solutions were proposed. In this paper, we ask a fundamental question: can we learn such detectors from scratch? Since it is often unclear what points are "interesting", human labelling can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 2a illustrates the common variations of this pipeline, from using hand-crafted detectors [7,19,30,32,34] and descriptors [7,9,25,30,45], replacing either the descriptor [6,55,56] or detector [50,70] with a learned alternative, or learning both the detector and descriptor [39,65]. For efficiency, the feature detector often considers only small image regions [65] and typically focuses on low-level structures such as corners [19] or blobs [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 2a illustrates the common variations of this pipeline, from using hand-crafted detectors [7,19,30,32,34] and descriptors [7,9,25,30,45], replacing either the descriptor [6,55,56] or detector [50,70] with a learned alternative, or learning both the detector and descriptor [39,65]. For efficiency, the feature detector often considers only small image regions [65] and typically focuses on low-level structures such as corners [19] or blobs [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse local features [6-8, 13, 14, 19, 30, 32-34, 50, 55, 56,60,65] are a popular approach to correspondence estimation. These methods follow a detect-then-describe approach that first applies a feature detector [7,13,19,30,32,34,50,65] to identify a set of keypoints or interest points. The detector then provides image patches extracted around the keypoints to the following feature description stage [6-8, 14, 30, 33, 55, 56, 60, 65].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no universal explicit definition of what a good keypoint is. This lack of specification inspires Quad-Networks [31] to adopt an unsupervised approach: they train a neural network to rank keypoints according to their robustness to random hand-crafted transformations. They keep the top/bottom quantile of the ranking as keypoints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning based methods can be divided into three classes. The first class methods only learn robust detectors [15], [35], [36]. One challenge is how to generate ground truth.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%