2006
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2006.877673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic optimization for simultaneous matrix diagonalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the estimation of the optimal parameters is the same as the one we obtained before when using the matrix transformation in (16).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the estimation of the optimal parameters is the same as the one we obtained before when using the matrix transformation in (16).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Many other algorithms have been developed by considering specific criteria or constraints in order to avoid trivial and degenerate solutions [14] [15]. These algorithms can be listed as follow: QDiag [16] (Quadratic Diagonalization algorithm) developed by Vollgraf and Obermayer where the JD criterion is rearranged as a quadratic cost function; FAJD [17] (Fast Approximative Joint Diagonalization) developed by Li and Zhang where the diagonalizing matrix is estimated column by column; UWEDGE [14] (UnWeighted Exhaustive joint Diagonalization with Gauss itErations) developed by Tichavsky and Yeredor where numerical optimization is used to get the JD solution; JUST [18] (Joint Unitary and Shear Transformations) developed by Iferroudjene, Abed-Meraim and Belouchrani where the algebraic joint diagonalization is considered; CVFFDiag [19] [20] (Complex Valued Fast Frobenius Diagonalization) developed by Xu, Feng and Zheng where first order of Taylor expansion is used to minimize the JD criterion; ALS [21] (Alternating Least Squares) developed by Trainini and Moreau where the mixing and diagonal matrices are estimated alternatively by using least squares criterion and LUCJD [22] [23] (LU decomposition for Complex Joint Diagonalization) developed by Wang, Gong and Lin where the diagonalizing matrix is estimated by LU decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our LSDIC algorithm to the well-established FFDIAG algorithm of [10] and QDIAG of [9]. We plan to perform a more comprehensive comparison and to publish that in a longer article elsewhere.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) of the performance index (7) attained by QDIAG [9], FFDIAG [10] and our LSDIC algorithm across 250 repetitions of the simulation with K = 15 and N = 30. The higher the mean and the lower the standard deviation, the better the performance.…”
Section: Orthogonal Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation