1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(97)00180-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadrature on the half line and two-point Padé approximants to Stieltjes functions. Part III. The unbounded case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expression appears just by rewriting Theorem 2.3 in [4] in terms of orthogonal Laurent polynomials. Indeed, let ψ n be the n-th orthogonal L-polynomial normalized as in Section 2 and let f be a function Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to φ such that f (2n) (t) is continuous for a ≤ t ≤ b.…”
Section: Now the Lower Bound Is Reached Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This expression appears just by rewriting Theorem 2.3 in [4] in terms of orthogonal Laurent polynomials. Indeed, let ψ n be the n-th orthogonal L-polynomial normalized as in Section 2 and let f be a function Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to φ such that f (2n) (t) is continuous for a ≤ t ≤ b.…”
Section: Now the Lower Bound Is Reached Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proceed as in [4,Theorem 5.3] to obtain the conclusion for a continuous functions f in [0, ∞) such that lim x→∞ f (x) exists, and after that, proceed as in [21,Lemma 2.7].…”
Section: Two-point Padé Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note [14] that the classical and strong moment problems (SMP, HMP, SSMP, and SHMP) are special cases of a more general theory, where moments corresponding to an arbitrary, countable sequence of (fixed) points are involved (in the classical and strong moment cases, respectively, the points are ∞ repeated and 0, ∞ cyclically repeated), and where orthogonal rational functions [26,32,33] play the rôle of orthogonal polynomials and orthogonal Laurent (or L-) polynomials; furthermore, since L-polynomials are rational functions with (fixed) poles at the origin and at the point at infinity, the step towards a more general theory where poles are at arbitrary, but fixed, positions/locations in C ∪ {∞} is natural, with applications to, say, multi-point Padé, and Padé-type, approximants [24,[34][35][36][37][38]; the so-called Christoffel numbers [35]. When considering the computation of integrals of the form π −π g(e iθ ) dµ(θ), where g is a complex-valued function on the unit circle D := {z ∈ C; |z|= 1} and µ is, say, a positive measure on [−π, π], in particular, when g is continuous on D, keeping in mind that a function continuous on D can be uniformly approximated by Lpolynomials, it is natural to consider, instead of orthogonal polynomials, Laurent polynomials, which are also related to the associated trigonometric moment problem [35,39] (see, also, [40] where c l = R s l e −N V(s) ds, l ∈ Z, with respect to the (unbounded) domain {z ∈ C; ε | Arg(z)| π−ε}, where Arg( * ) denotes the principal argument of * , and ε > 0 is sufficiently small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] (see also [10]) the polynomials were replaced by Laurent polynomials having a finite number of positive and negative powers of z. In that situation, exactness can be obtained for certain spaces of Laurent polynomials of dimension 2n − 1, if we take as nodes the zeros of orthogonal Laurent polynomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%