2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-020-00506-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative analysis of edible oil oxidation using an olfactory machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anisidine index indicates the secondary products of oxidation produced as the result of peroxides destruction (Bonilla, Atares, Vargas, & Chiralt, 2012). According to the strict standard regulation in Iran, the oils with acidity index above 0.6 and peroxide levels more than 5 are considered as the spoiled oil (Karami, Rasekh, & Mirzaee‐Ghaleh, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisidine index indicates the secondary products of oxidation produced as the result of peroxides destruction (Bonilla, Atares, Vargas, & Chiralt, 2012). According to the strict standard regulation in Iran, the oils with acidity index above 0.6 and peroxide levels more than 5 are considered as the spoiled oil (Karami, Rasekh, & Mirzaee‐Ghaleh, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection system includes nine MOS (Table 2), which electrical properties change according to the adsorption phenomena that occurs on the sensors surface when in contact with volatile compounds. The same or similar MOS have been previously used due to their capability to detect different aroma compounds of olive fruits [34] and vegetable oils [17,22,35,36]. The MOS sensors are porous layers heated by a filament that undergoes a redox reaction when it comes in contact with a reducing or oxidizing volatile compound, changing the electrical resistance across the circuit proportionally to the compound concentration.…”
Section: E-nose Analysis 231 Lab-made Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples (0.5 mL) were then put into a glass vial (25 mL) and placed in the sampling chamber during 13 min (to allow obtaining a headspace with a volatile fraction representative of the sample) at 28 • C (temperature recommended by the International Olive Council for olive oils sensory analysis) [5]. Although several gas sample pre-concentration procedures exist, the static headspace technique was chosen due to its simplicity and rapid acquisition of a representative sample of the oil's volatile fraction, allowing an easy on-line and in-situ implementation, being widely implemented with both lab-made and commercial E-noses [30,35,36]. At the same time, the E-nose system was cleaned during 13 min using air flow (pumped under vacuum) or nitrogen flow (UN 1066, Linde 089 cyl 02/15) for the standard solutions or olive oils analysis, respectively, enabling reaching a stable signal baseline, indicative of a cleaned environment.…”
Section: Sample Conditioning and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their Enose system composed of six commercial SMOs was able to successfully discriminate between twenty-seven and identify five Moroccan virgin olive oil cluster samples based on the analysis carried out by techniques such as PCA and LDA. Karami et al constructed a portable Enose system consisting of eight SMO sensors for investigating the oxidative degree of edible oil along with identifying the presence of adulterants [97]. In combination with CA, PCA, SVM, PLS regression, and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) techniques, the developed Enose device was able to successfully detect the levels of oxidation in edible oil with different levels of precision and also profile the level of different adulterants in the sample of oxidised oil compared to the non-oxidized sample.…”
Section: Oilsmentioning
confidence: 99%