2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0308210500000895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative behaviour of positive solutions of a predator—prey model: effects of saturation

Abstract: We study a predator–prey system with Holling–Tanner interaction terms. We show that if the saturation rate m is large, spatially inhomogeneous steady-state solutions arise, contrasting sharply with the small-m case, where no such solution could exist. Furthermore, for large m, we give sharp estimates on the ranges of other parameters where spatially inhomogeneous solutions can exist. We also determine the asymptotic behaviour of the spatially inhomogeneous solutions as m → ∞, and an interesting relation betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both [DD] and [DHs], only one attracting state seems possible, contrasting the possible bistability for (1.2). On the other hand, when the environment is homogeneous (a(x) ≡ a), the set of steady state solutions of (1.2) was studied in [DL3] for the large m case (see also [BB,CEL,DL1,DL2] for Dirichlet problems), and for small m, it follows from results in [dMR] that the system has at most one positive steady-state, and it is a constant solution and is globally attracting (when it exists). In this paper, we consider a general m > 0, and most of our results holds for all positive m. In particular we show that for intermediate m (neither small nor large), (1.2) may have a global branch of steady state solutions whose shape is roughly a reversed S (see Figure 1 (b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both [DD] and [DHs], only one attracting state seems possible, contrasting the possible bistability for (1.2). On the other hand, when the environment is homogeneous (a(x) ≡ a), the set of steady state solutions of (1.2) was studied in [DL3] for the large m case (see also [BB,CEL,DL1,DL2] for Dirichlet problems), and for small m, it follows from results in [dMR] that the system has at most one positive steady-state, and it is a constant solution and is globally attracting (when it exists). In this paper, we consider a general m > 0, and most of our results holds for all positive m. In particular we show that for intermediate m (neither small nor large), (1.2) may have a global branch of steady state solutions whose shape is roughly a reversed S (see Figure 1 (b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-constant positive steady states (i.e. stationary patterns), we refer to [11][12][13]. On the other hand, under homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, many authors have discussed the existence of positive steady states which involves difficult a priori estimates, see e.g., [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with Turing's seminal paper [34], diffusion and cross-diffusion have been observed as causes of the spontaneous emergence of ordered structures, called patterns in a variety of non-equilibrium situations. They include the Gierer-Meinhardt model [35][36][37][38], the Sel'kov model [26,39], the Lotka-Volterra competition model [40][41][42] and the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model [20,23,24,[43][44][45] and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%