2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Evaluation of a Pain Intensity Screen for Children with Severe Neurodevelopmental Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pain being such a common and important feature of pathophysiology, it will be important to be able to recognise pain as a possible cause of emotional distress and not to presume that pain is absent when its presentation is atypical. The use of an analogue pain scale, or of an informant-report scale [ 12 , 13 ], may help such assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain being such a common and important feature of pathophysiology, it will be important to be able to recognise pain as a possible cause of emotional distress and not to presume that pain is absent when its presentation is atypical. The use of an analogue pain scale, or of an informant-report scale [ 12 , 13 ], may help such assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers recognize that pain in children with intellectual disabilities is a common and complex phenomenon, there are no standard educational components for caregivers or guardians of such children [23,24]. Our study focuses on information for parents and professionals that nonverbal children (1 to 6 years old) with paralytic syndromes may have chronic pain, and they should be monitored for pain that parents can use with a physical therapy professional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The r-FLACC is easy to apply in various inpatient settings and can be completed quickly, whereas the NCCPC-PV and the PPP are substantially more elaborate and cumbersome, with their many items and wide scoring ranges (Crosta et al , 2014). In addition to the above mentioned measures, pain assessment scales with more detailed information are established for the use in persons with IDD, such as the faces pain scale (FPS/FPS-R), the child facial coding system, the adult pain checklist-revised (NCAPC), and the tailored observation pain screen (Parker and Belew, 2013; Lotan et al , 2009; Hicks et al , 2001; Gilbert et al , 1999). The aforementioned PADS/PEP is a rather sophisticated measure, which assesses possible pain behavior based on a standardized clinical examination and was constructed for the use in adults with IDD and acute or chronic pain (Bodfish et al , 2006).…”
Section: Pain Assessment In Subjects With Rttmentioning
confidence: 99%