AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-4761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Failure Analysis for a Small Quadrotor Unmanned Aircraft System

Abstract: As Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) become more prevalent, their safety and integration into the National Airspace System has become a topic of much debate. Current regulations are difficult to apply to UAS, particularly small UAS for which development, certification, and production costs must be kept at a minimum to remain competitive. This prohibits the use of triple or even double redundancy in their designs and limits the amount of validation and verification the developers may perform. Proper identificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One method for demonstrating initial and continued airworthiness compliance, part of which includes the failure rate analysis, is through safety assessment using techniques including functional hazard analysis, system safety assessment, fault tree analysis, etc. [16]- [18] For a novel and experimental aircraft type with no existing airworthiness requirements, such as multirotor UASs, one of the common methods used to evaluate reliability is the use of fault-tree analysis [19]- [21]. This would involve the creation of a fault tree for the UAS by identifying possible failure or sequence of failures that would lead to a crash event: for example, single motor failure in multirotor UAS is generally non-recoverable without fault diagnosis algorithms [22] or specialized flight control software [23], while failure in a radio receiver would not result in a crash without the flight controller also failing.…”
Section: Uas Failure Rate and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method for demonstrating initial and continued airworthiness compliance, part of which includes the failure rate analysis, is through safety assessment using techniques including functional hazard analysis, system safety assessment, fault tree analysis, etc. [16]- [18] For a novel and experimental aircraft type with no existing airworthiness requirements, such as multirotor UASs, one of the common methods used to evaluate reliability is the use of fault-tree analysis [19]- [21]. This would involve the creation of a fault tree for the UAS by identifying possible failure or sequence of failures that would lead to a crash event: for example, single motor failure in multirotor UAS is generally non-recoverable without fault diagnosis algorithms [22] or specialized flight control software [23], while failure in a radio receiver would not result in a crash without the flight controller also failing.…”
Section: Uas Failure Rate and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that this initial set is still being refined and is subject to change in the final recommended set of hazards-based test scenarios being developed. Further work is needed in defining failure modes and their effects for sUAS 25,26,27 , especially multirotor configurations, and in the development of a full set of hazards-based test scenarios at the vehicle level. Test scenarios designed to assess operational safety under off-nominal and hazardous conditions and the effectiveness of contingency management systems designed to ensure operational safety are also needed.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to Olson et al in 2013 analyzed the failure of the Michigan quadrotor, the remaining useful lifemulti-rotore was estimated through FTA. The reliability of multirotors with various configurations was investigated based on the controllability degree [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%