Qualitative research interviews using online video technology – challenges and opportunities

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the methodological and method-related challenges and opportunities arising from the use of video interviews in qualitative accounting research, focussed on collecting contextual data and visual cues, enriching communication quality and building and maintaining rapport with interviewees. Design/methodology/approach Prior literature and the authors’ experiences using video technologies for research, including conducting interviews, inform this research. This study uses a transactional conceptual refinement of information richness theory and channel expansion theory to critically analyse the challenges and opportunities of using video technology to conduct qualitative research interviews. Findings The ability, need for and significance of collecting contextual data depend on the researchers’ ontological and epistemological assumptions, and are, therefore, influenced by their research design choices. Video technology enables researchers to view research settings by video. In addition, whilst group/panel interviews have their advantages, it is often difficult to get everyone together in person, something video technology can potentially overcome. The feasibility and the quality of video interviews can be improved if both interview participants are experienced with using video technology, as well as with judicious investment in good quality video technology and through testing and practice. We also discuss how rapport building with interviewees can be facilitated by overcoming the video’s sense of disconnect and enhancing interviewees’ willingness to engage. Originality/value The study builds on the limited prior literature and considers the challenges and opportunities related to methodology and method when conducting video-based qualitative interviews in accounting research. Broadly, qualitative researchers will find the paper useful in considering the use of video interviews and in making research design choices appropriate for video interviews.

Remaking academic library services in Zimbabwe in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic

“…WhatsApp and Facebook call facilities were used as they were chosen because of cost and convenience as they were preferred by the participants. In addition, the use of online platforms for conducting interviews was the most safe, secure and reliable means of collecting data as suggested by De Villiers, Farooq, and Molinari (2021) .…”

Making up circular consumers: young adults’ personal accounting and counter earmarking within a circular deposit-refund scheme

“…Three focus groups with respondents aged 21-28 were conducted during the COVID-19 crisis, in April 2020, using Zoom communications software in smaller groups (4-5 participants) to facilitate interaction in a digital format. The fact that these focus groups were held online provided an opportunity to invite geographically dispersed participants (de Villiers et al, 2021). These three focus groups included participants from the student cities Umeå, Uppsala, Gothenburg and Lund.…”

Rigorous Qualitative Research Involving Data Collected Remotely From People With Communication Disorders: Experience From a Telerehabilitation Trial

“…For example, in the telehealth project this paper originated from, the budget included equipment for people who did not already own it. This is a recommendation many authors provided concerning remote data collection, 35,37,48,49 but it needs to be stressed when including people living with communication disorders. Pocock et al 36 also advise assessing the technological capabilities of participants and, if needed, offer training; * Knowing that telecommunication interactions can be more demanding, whether by telephone, instant messaging, or teleconference, 31,54 offer more breaks than you would in a face-to-face setting and schedule shorter sessions, even if it means holding more of them.…”

“…For example, in the telehealth project this paper originated from, the budget included equipment for people who did not already own it. This is a recommendation many authors provided concerning remote data collection, 35,37,48,49 but it needs to be stressed when including people living with communication disorders. Pocock et al 36 also advise assessing the technological capabilities of participants and, if needed, offer training;…”

“…However, this applies to participants who can use communication technology easily. Without referring directly to people with communication impairments, de Villiers et al 35 warned that facial expressions and body language facilitate communication in face-to-face interviews, while Pocock et al 36 highlighted the ethical challenges tied to virtual methodologies, including Internet-user population bias and underrepresentation of the other.…”