2017
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2017-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-adjusted life year difference in patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia treated with cariprazine and risperidone

Abstract: Aim:Our study aimed at estimating differences in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain for patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia treated with cariprazine compared with risperidone. Materials & methods:A Markov model was built, based on the Mohr-Lenert approach and data derived from clinical trials, to estimate potential QALY gains of patients. Results: Patients had higher probability of reaching better health states treated with cariprazine compared with risperidone. In the model, this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Cariprazine showed a significant effect on primary negative symptoms after 14 weeks of treatment and continued to improve until the endpoint, at week 26. The reduction of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale factor score for negative symptoms (PANSS-FSNS) was paralleled by a greater improvement in functioning (self-care, interpersonal relationship, and social activities), with a consequent increase in the quality of life 60 as previously shown for aripiprazole but not with paliperidone 9 emphasizing the added value of the partial agonism activity.…”
Section: Cariprazinesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…10 Cariprazine showed a significant effect on primary negative symptoms after 14 weeks of treatment and continued to improve until the endpoint, at week 26. The reduction of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale factor score for negative symptoms (PANSS-FSNS) was paralleled by a greater improvement in functioning (self-care, interpersonal relationship, and social activities), with a consequent increase in the quality of life 60 as previously shown for aripiprazole but not with paliperidone 9 emphasizing the added value of the partial agonism activity.…”
Section: Cariprazinesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Quality-adjusted life-year gain was also modeled, and resulted in an estimated quality-adjusted life-year gain of 0.029 per patient after 1 year of treatment. 28 The most common adverse event for cariprazine was akathisia (8%), which was also observed for 5% of persons randomized to risperidone.…”
Section: Negative Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other sources of information included product labeling 10 and the author’s prior published reviews. 11 13 Searching for “cariprazine” using PubMed yielded 125 records, of which 15 were original reports of clinical trial data in persons with schizophrenia, 14 28 24 were medicinal chemistry or preclinical research reports, 29 52 9 were original reports of cariprazine clinical trial data for disorders other than schizophrenia, 53 61 and the remainder consisted of reviews, commentaries, or articles that did not appear directly relevant. Three meta-analyses were found that focused on cariprazine and included data for the treatment of schizophrenia.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost-effectiveness model has been described elsewhere ( Fig. 1) [9]. Briefly, a Markov cohort model was built in Microsoft Excel with eight health states for schizophrenia (hereinafter referred to as the Mohr-Lenert health states) defined by Mohr et al in 2004 and a death state [10].…”
Section: The Context Of the Case Study Is As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informative priors based on expert opinions might be more appropriate than vague priors. found in a concise format in Table 2 of the paper presenting the cost-effectiveness model [9]. As the pivotal clinical trial in which the model was based on provided no data on mortality, as there were not any participants who died during the study period, the age-and sex-specific mortality rates of the general population were used in the model, and no difference in the mortality between the two treatment groups was assumed [11].…”
Section: The Context Of the Case Study Is As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%