1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0044025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
272
2
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
272
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender diversity had either no effects or positive effects on team processes. This is consistent with research that has shown that sex balanced groups have more positive interactions than either predominantly male or predominantly female groups (Hoffman & Maier, 1961;Wood, 1987).…”
Section: Summary and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Gender diversity had either no effects or positive effects on team processes. This is consistent with research that has shown that sex balanced groups have more positive interactions than either predominantly male or predominantly female groups (Hoffman & Maier, 1961;Wood, 1987).…”
Section: Summary and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Other studies claim that gender homogeneity improves interaction and performance (Alagna et al 1982;see also Turner 1987;Ibarra 1992). However, Kochan et al (2003) conclude from their study that gender diversityhas apositiveimpact,if any, ontheteam process.They saythat this is consistent with results reported previously in the literature, which found that gender-balanced groups have more positive interactions than predominantly female or male groups (Hoffman and Maier 1961;Wood 1987). Most diversity research tends towards the pessimistic view that diversity encourages social division, conflict and horseplay.…”
Section: Team Attributes and Performancesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This should aid participants to develop new strategies or adjust existing ones. CCM builds upon literature in the field of organisational psychology, which shows that conflict in teams can lead to more creativity and better decision-making processes (Hoffman, 1959;Hoffman and Maier, 1961;Brodbeck et al, 2002). In our case, constructive conflict serves as a mechanism to explore creatively divergent future perspectives.…”
Section: A Participatory Exploratory Scenario Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%