2011
DOI: 10.1057/9780230306462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and Legitimacy of Global Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on Cadman [20] and Hogl [38], it is understood that cross-sectoral coordination is enabled through collaboration of different policy actors, notably via their participation in decision-making processes. Sectoral interests are represented by not only state government bodies, but also by a range of non-state actors and networks.…”
Section: Cross-sectoral Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing on Cadman [20] and Hogl [38], it is understood that cross-sectoral coordination is enabled through collaboration of different policy actors, notably via their participation in decision-making processes. Sectoral interests are represented by not only state government bodies, but also by a range of non-state actors and networks.…”
Section: Cross-sectoral Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More attention is needed on the structural challenges for REDD+ institutional arrangements [8]. In particular, challenges associated with sector coordination and participation of stakeholders have been among the most prominent governance issues shared by countries developing REDD+, and evidenced in their national strategic documents for preparing REDD+, such as Readiness Preparation Proposals (R-PP) submitted to the FCPF, and have received particular attention in the literature [3,7,[19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questioned Tim Cadman [28] in his Paper on Contemporary Governance Theory (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).Contemporary Governance Theory (1990-2010) identified in comparative politics, public administration, international relations and political economy (Tim Cadman) [ibid] . Governance itself is also more understood in terms of how it is manifested not merely at the national and international level, but at all spatial scales, demonstrated by the interactions between decentralized networks comprising multi-stakeholders active at all levels, from the local to the global, and vice versa.…”
Section: Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that discussion and dialogue is fruitful and actually delivers outputs, that can be acted upon). Based on this division between structure as participation and process as deliberation, the meaning of these two principles is elaborated by developing criteria and indicators to examine the degree to which they are achieved in a given institutional policy context (Cadman 2011a). …”
Section: : Theoretical Approach To Assessing the Governance Dimensiomentioning
confidence: 99%