2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2010.5653339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment of asymmetric stereo video coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former causes flickering artifacts especially when coding sequences, which contain fast object motion, while the latter produces inevitable blocking artifacts when coding videos at low bitrates [7,8]. Still, the mixed spatial-resolution approach provides better perceived quality than other coding approaches when coding multi-view videos at low bitrates [2,9].…”
Section: Context and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former causes flickering artifacts especially when coding sequences, which contain fast object motion, while the latter produces inevitable blocking artifacts when coding videos at low bitrates [7,8]. Still, the mixed spatial-resolution approach provides better perceived quality than other coding approaches when coding multi-view videos at low bitrates [2,9].…”
Section: Context and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetry can be achieved through spatial [15], quality [13], [14] or temporal [16] scaling in one of the views. There are thus algorithms studying the unequal bit allocation [18], [19] between two views for the case of asymmetric stereo coding. However, these algorithms only consider bit allocation between views in one stereo video.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on binocular suppression theory [5][6][7], bit-rate and computational complexity reduction can be simultaneously achieved by mixed-resolution, or asymmetric coding of the stereo images [8][9][10]. The objective quality of lowresolution views can be recovered at the decoder side, using high-frequency information from neighboring views [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%