2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment of the PRODES Cerrado deforestation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to deforestation, our results indicate that forest formations were the most affected in absolute area (52.7 Mha ±0.99%), while savanna and grassland formations were the most affected in relative area, with a reduction in vegetation cover of 27.43% ±1.18% and 19.04% ±0.64%, respectively, between 1988 and 2018, mainly affecting the Cerrado, Pantanal, and Caatinga biomes [35][36][37][38] . This can be explained by the negligence of the Brazilian state in monitoring deforestation in the country's non-forest formations, instituting the PRODES Cerrado only in 2016 5 , more than two decades after the beginning of PRODES Amazônia, the system responsible for monitor only forest formations in the Legal Amazon 39 . Specifically in the Legal Amazon, the period from 2008 to 2014 had the smallest deforested areas (see Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With regard to deforestation, our results indicate that forest formations were the most affected in absolute area (52.7 Mha ±0.99%), while savanna and grassland formations were the most affected in relative area, with a reduction in vegetation cover of 27.43% ±1.18% and 19.04% ±0.64%, respectively, between 1988 and 2018, mainly affecting the Cerrado, Pantanal, and Caatinga biomes [35][36][37][38] . This can be explained by the negligence of the Brazilian state in monitoring deforestation in the country's non-forest formations, instituting the PRODES Cerrado only in 2016 5 , more than two decades after the beginning of PRODES Amazônia, the system responsible for monitor only forest formations in the Legal Amazon 39 . Specifically in the Legal Amazon, the period from 2008 to 2014 had the smallest deforested areas (see Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches, however, are not free from the bias of subjectivity and the criteria of each interpreter, the occurrence of eventual georeferencing errors or, depending on the image resolution, the presence of pixels with spectral mixing 20 . On the other hand, the synergy between spatially explicit mappings, based on the use of automated classifiers, and point samples is necessary, either for validation purposes or for area adjustments 5,14,19,20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These pressures have been increasingly intensive and frequent, primarily due to the expansion of the agricultural frontier. As a result, although the productivity per hectare has increased considerably over the last decades, the substitution rate of natural vegetation with cultivated areas in the Cerrado remains with the highest values among the Brazilian biomes [19][20][21][22]. A good example is the region named Matopiba, concerning its localization among the Brazilian states of Maranhão (MA), Tocantins (TO), Piauí (PI), and Bahia (BA) [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%