Qualilty Assurance in Environmental Monitoring 1995
DOI: 10.1002/9783527615216.ch03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assurance and quality control of surface water sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear to what extent small-scale temporal variations contribute to a temporal pattern in general terms, pilot studies to test sampling performance, the equivalent of interlaboratory analytical studies, are rarely reported in the literature. Logical structures, to test hypothesis 25 and statistical tools (e.g., experimental design, optimal sampling program) [26][27][28] that could be used to design monitoring programs, are also often neglected. To date, there are no standards, or prescribed procedures for sampling strategies in environmental analysis of water quality (in contrast with other fields, e.g., biomedical research) and a different sampling strategy must therefore be established for each project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear to what extent small-scale temporal variations contribute to a temporal pattern in general terms, pilot studies to test sampling performance, the equivalent of interlaboratory analytical studies, are rarely reported in the literature. Logical structures, to test hypothesis 25 and statistical tools (e.g., experimental design, optimal sampling program) [26][27][28] that could be used to design monitoring programs, are also often neglected. To date, there are no standards, or prescribed procedures for sampling strategies in environmental analysis of water quality (in contrast with other fields, e.g., biomedical research) and a different sampling strategy must therefore be established for each project.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%