2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-3615(02)00082-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assurance of design support software: review and analysis of the state of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely acknowledged that formal methods can contribute to improvement of the development processes as well as of quality of the products (see e.g., Savino and Mazza, 2014;Opiyo, 2003). To this end, process models serve, among other things, as means to support systematic elicitation and specification of requirements and to assure consistent monitoring of fulfilment of requirements as the design process progresses (see e.g., Opiyo et al, 2002;Opiyo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Research Problem Hypothesis and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is widely acknowledged that formal methods can contribute to improvement of the development processes as well as of quality of the products (see e.g., Savino and Mazza, 2014;Opiyo, 2003). To this end, process models serve, among other things, as means to support systematic elicitation and specification of requirements and to assure consistent monitoring of fulfilment of requirements as the design process progresses (see e.g., Opiyo et al, 2002;Opiyo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Research Problem Hypothesis and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some literature suggests that the application of formal methods, especially at the analysis, requirements specification, and at the design phase improves quality through reduced defects in the final products (see e.g., Langari et al, 2005;Opiyo et al, 2002). Since structural design is part of the design process, it is expected that the application of the observed LRL structural design scheme would also contribute to further quality improvements through reduction of errors and omissions in the in-process deliverables.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also meant to encourage and to facilitate early discovery of faults. To this end, abstract prototyping serves as a prototyping and review technique for the in-process deliverables of the fuzzy-front end stage of the development process-see, e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]. That is, theories/concepts or engineering principles, methods or functional units, algorithms or architectural layouts, and pilot prototypes are treated as reviewable or testable implementations.…”
Section: The Basics Of Abstract Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the literature from training and development, product development and computer software tends to use the terms 'pilot-test ' and 'beta-test' interchangeably (for example, Chernick 1992;Wurangian 1993;Howe and Pearlstein 1995;Rosenkrans 2001;Opiyo, Horvath, and Vergeest 2002), there are subtle differences between the two activities. Dolan and Matthews (1993) pointed to one important distinction: product design should be frozen prior to the beta-testing phase.…”
Section: Product Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%