2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.11.008
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assurance practices for point of care testing programs: Recommendations by the Canadian society of clinical chemists point of care testing interest group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a need for quality assurance interventions such as training to manage the accuracy and subsequent availability of REASSURED POC diagnostic tests. To ensure the quality of POC tests, both skilled and non-skilled test handlers should be trained to use POC tests competently [5]. Accurate diagnosis will ensures that patients are treated correctly and that disease surveillance is trustworthy [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also a need for quality assurance interventions such as training to manage the accuracy and subsequent availability of REASSURED POC diagnostic tests. To ensure the quality of POC tests, both skilled and non-skilled test handlers should be trained to use POC tests competently [5]. Accurate diagnosis will ensures that patients are treated correctly and that disease surveillance is trustworthy [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests are medical tests conducted outside a clinical laboratory, in the proximity of the patient and are often performed by non-laboratory personnel such as nurses, physicians, and patients. POC tests are commonly used where the turnaround time for patient results is short or in areas where central laboratory testing is unavailable [5]. The lack of high-quality diagnostics in resource limited healthcare systems causes significant delays in surveillance, detection, control, and prompt treatment of infectious diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual swab specimens (e.g. fresh or previously frozen), contrived dry swabs, or extraction buffer spiked with a known amount of viral material can be used in verification studies [41] . Samples may be selected based on days post-symptom onset, viral load Ct values from laboratory-based RT-PCR, or viral copy number.…”
Section: Quality Management Framework For Sars-cov-2 Poctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fresh or previously frozen) can be used when liquid transport media is acceptable to use with the POCT For NAAT only accepting dry swabs, contrived dry swabs can be created using residual swab specimens in universal transport media (e.g. fresh or previously frozen) following the method described by the FDA [41] or residual specimen transport media can be used to spike the POC extraction buffer NOTE: it is important to choose samples with Ct values that take into account the limit of detection of the POCT and the extra dilution step when adding the dry swab or transport buffer to the extraction buffer Manufacturer QC or third-party, commercial material with known viral load may be used but is suboptimal compared to clinical samples Specimen stability(if testing will not be completed immediately) Many manufacturers recommend to perform analysis within a set time after specimen collection or after adding specimen to the POCT extraction buffer Verify time intervals expected with typical daily workflow and if delays in testing after specimen collection are expected, ensure results with delayed testing are comparable to testing fresh specimens Repeatability Patient samples or QC material SARS-CoV-2 negative, strong positive, and moderate/weak positive (close to claimed positive/negative cut-off or LOD) Run each level once a day/shift for at least 3 days/shifts Preferably by different operators Patient samples or QC material SARS-CoV-2 negative, strong positive, and moderate/weak positive (close to claimed cut-off or LOD) Run each level once a day/shift for at least 3 days/shifts Preferably by different operators When Ct data are available, measure precision aiming for ≤5% CV When more than one gene is targets, measure repeatability/precision for each gene target Limit of detection verification Residual patient samples with moderate Ct Perform a series of dilutions bracketing expected cut-off and LOD For each dilution, run samples in replicates of 5-10 (all data should be Log10 transformed for analysis). Cut-off/LOD: Equivalent to Ct value at which 95% of replicates remain positive.…”
Section: Quality Management Framework For Sars-cov-2 Poctmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation