2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927611000237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Assurance Testing for Modern Optical Imaging Systems

Abstract: The days of being able to ascertain instrument performance by simply peering through the eye pieces at a specimen are gone. However, users and granting agencies need to be confident that data collected on these instruments is uniform and quantifiable both over time and between instruments. Ideally, a LASER should not fluctuate, illumination should be completely uniform, and colors should be perfectly aligned. To check the current performance of imaging equipment, we conducted a worldwide research study utilizi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular system checks should be common practice and measure e.g. the point spread function (PSF), the laser power, the illumination homogeneity of the field of view, the detector sensitivity as signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) and the coefficient of variation (Cole et al, 2011, 2013; Gelman and Rietdorf, 2010; Hibbs, 2006; Stack et al, 2011; Theer et al, 2014; Zucker and Price, 2001, 1999). When performed regularly, standardized test series often help identify damaged and misaligned microscope components, even before they significantly impair the quality of user data.…”
Section: How To Design Set Up and Run Your Imaging Core Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular system checks should be common practice and measure e.g. the point spread function (PSF), the laser power, the illumination homogeneity of the field of view, the detector sensitivity as signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) and the coefficient of variation (Cole et al, 2011, 2013; Gelman and Rietdorf, 2010; Hibbs, 2006; Stack et al, 2011; Theer et al, 2014; Zucker and Price, 2001, 1999). When performed regularly, standardized test series often help identify damaged and misaligned microscope components, even before they significantly impair the quality of user data.…”
Section: How To Design Set Up and Run Your Imaging Core Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these problems would not have been noticed by the average facility users with their biological samples. And the confocal microscope cannot be examined in isolation either, the impact of environmental factors like air flow and temperature changes also needs to be considered, for example by measuring room and/or microscope stage temperature in conjunction with some of the performance tests (Figure S2A/B, Figure S10B/C)[29,37]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You should use a fluorescent plastic test slide in order to measure the light source intensity during warm up and the intensity stability over time to ensure it does not vary during your experimental timeframe (55). Some light sources may need more time to warm up (mercury arc lamps), while others may not need to be warmed up at all (LED light sources).…”
Section: Image Collection Corrections and Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%