External quality assurance (EQA) denotes the measures taken to ensure the reliability of laboratory sampling, testing, and reporting when test results are to make an impact on clinical decision making (1). EQA in its broader sense is more comprehensive than \external quality control" (EQC), since it includes the important aspects of laboratory proficiency, performance scoring, quality of advice given to clinicians, and continuous educational support.Clinical cell analysis by flow cytometry has entered the same process of development of instrumental validation, internal/external QC, and EQA as any other laboratory medicine activities during the late '80s. The outbreak of the AIDS epidemics, and the need to guide medical treatment with reliable CD4 þ T cell counts have been a stimulus to direct an esoteric, mostly experimental technology towards the same accuracy and reproducibility as has been established for routine blood testing.The progress in establishing a quality assurance process in clinical cell analysis by flow cytometry has been particularly slow, as compared to other fields of clinical pathology, for a number of reasons: the delicacy of instrumentation, the rapidly evolving hardware and software, the continuous development of new biological targets, antibody reagents and fluorochromes, and most important the lacking of any previously existing discipline to encompass all the aspects of clinical cytometry (2).During the last two decades a long and sometimes difficult process took place, complicated by multiple waves of technical development and clinical validation of many different applications such as leukemia/lymphoma immunophenotyping, CD34þ hematopoietic stem cell analysis, screening for the HLA B27 antigen, low level leucocyte counting, and many \niche" applications. The evolution of clinical cell analysis by flow cytometry is a good example of how the advent of a new technology can take advantage from the established laboratory qual-*Correspondence to: Prof. Bruno Brando,