Quality control of constructions: European trends and developments

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is based on a series of research projects carried out over a number of years. The research results were updated in 2016 with a desktop research project in seven European countries. The results from this latest project form the heart of this paper. The information is organised into tables that describe and analyse the main features of the quality control systems of the countries (e.g. scope, focus and main characteristics of the procedures and quality demands on building professionals).Findings -Several similar trends can be recognised in the quality control systems of the various European Union (EU) countries. Quality control is getting more and more privatised and the control framework is setting checks and balances throughout the construction process. Other findings are that scope and focus of the statutory control is unbalanced. Within the control processes emphasis is put on the safety aspects of complex constructions. Far fewer demands are made on the quality of the builders. Re-orientation of the building regulatory framework seems to be needed.Research limitations/implications -The paper only focusses on European countries where private quality control is established and on selected topics. The findings are based on desktop research and not on the practical experiences of the stakeholders involved in the countries studied.Practical implications -The paper draws some important recommendations for policymakers in the building regulatory field. It suggests both an enhancement of the effectiveness of the quality control procedure as well as the commitment of builders to comply with the regulations.Social implications -The quality of constructions is essential for the wellbeing and safety of its users, its occupants or its visitors. This applies to the whole range of quality aspects: structural-and fire safety, health, sustainability and usability aspects. The analyses and recommendations of this paper aim to contribute to an improvement of the overall construction quality.Originality/value -The paper makes an original contribution to the (limited) literature that is available in this field. The results can be used to situate the quality contro...

Causes of Quality Failures in Building Energy Renovation Projects of Northern China: A Review and Empirical Study

“…In addition, various technical solutions are significant to reduce the causes of quality failures, like developing and applying online tools to share information efficiently in the building energy renovation projects. Meijer and Visscher [64] also advised applying online systems further through the construction process. In contrast, Jingmond and Ågren [41] considered that organizational solutions rather than technical advice need further attention to solving the causes of quality failures.…”

Unravelling Causes of Quality Failures in Building Energy Renovation Projects of Northern China: Quality Management Perspective

“…A solution is to use an efficient information sharing system, such as the Building Information Model (BIM), in building energy renovation projects to improve communications among onsite participants. Meijer and Visscher (2017) also advised governments to develop some online tools to further guide and organize onsite participants through the construction process.…”

Opportunities and challenges for GeoBIM in Europe: developing a building permits use-case to raise awareness and examine technical interoperability challenges

“…A more comprehensive overview of the current building permission workflow in many European countries was given by Meijer and Visscher (2017), Meijer and Visscher (2016), Pedro et al (2011) and Meijer et al (2002). From these sources, it is possible to divide the building permit workflow into the following core steps, also considering the parts of the workflow that take place after the start of construction, even if not explicitly reported by the participant countries:…”