2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Culture in the Romanian Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While prior research has highlighted barriers for the implementation of quality at the institutional level (Kohoutek et al 2013;Land and Rattray 2014), changes in organizational culture are increasingly recognized as one of the primary conditions for successful implementation of Total Quality Management (Hildebrandt et al 1991). In consequence, a number of studies have prioritized QC as a matter of internal institutional quality in HEIs and as a key for continuous improvement, sustainable competitive advantage, and excellence in the context of a knowledge-based society, mostly in European nations (Barbulescu 2015;Adina-Petruţa 2014;Greere and Riley 2014;Lanarès 2009) besides a few Sub-Saharan African (Ansah 2015;Ntim 2014) and Asian nations (Krouglov 2017;Quyen et al 2017;Jawad et al 2015). Even though it has indeed been recommended for organizations to pay more attention to the development of appropriate QC (Dellana and Hauser 1999) in their effort to the management of QA mechanisms, there seems to be a gap in the literature considering staff perceptions indispensable in developing a QC in HEIs, specifically in the context of Bangladesh.…”
Section: Higher Education In Bangladesh: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prior research has highlighted barriers for the implementation of quality at the institutional level (Kohoutek et al 2013;Land and Rattray 2014), changes in organizational culture are increasingly recognized as one of the primary conditions for successful implementation of Total Quality Management (Hildebrandt et al 1991). In consequence, a number of studies have prioritized QC as a matter of internal institutional quality in HEIs and as a key for continuous improvement, sustainable competitive advantage, and excellence in the context of a knowledge-based society, mostly in European nations (Barbulescu 2015;Adina-Petruţa 2014;Greere and Riley 2014;Lanarès 2009) besides a few Sub-Saharan African (Ansah 2015;Ntim 2014) and Asian nations (Krouglov 2017;Quyen et al 2017;Jawad et al 2015). Even though it has indeed been recommended for organizations to pay more attention to the development of appropriate QC (Dellana and Hauser 1999) in their effort to the management of QA mechanisms, there seems to be a gap in the literature considering staff perceptions indispensable in developing a QC in HEIs, specifically in the context of Bangladesh.…”
Section: Higher Education In Bangladesh: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karami et al (2016) also show that customers' culture and values have an important effect on the perception and expectation of service quality. Barbulescu (2015) mentions that culture characterizes a population in terms of their shared attitudes, values and practices. Therefore, although culture and values may be assessed separately, in the analysis presented in this paper, they are treated as one variable.…”
Section: Service Quality and Culture/valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information regarding continuous improvement is available in Marshall (2010, p. 143-166) and Chipere (2017, p. 36-55). Studies by Vilcea (2014, p. 148-152) and Barbulescu (2015Barbulescu ( , p. 1923Barbulescu ( -1927 discuss the culture of quality, and Eryılmaz et al(2016, p. 60-69) and Bourke and Roper(2017, p. 1505-1518 discuss quality management.…”
Section: What Characteristics Enter the Definition Of Quality?mentioning
confidence: 99%