2020
DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1780356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality in conversation analysis and interpersonal process recall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in recent versions the method is not used solely to bring back what happened during interaction1, but also to encourage reflection on the participants experiences as they watch the video in the ‘here and now’ of interaction2. 8 , 23 , 24 Thus, VISRIs are conducted with the aim of identifying descriptive categories characterizing informants’ experiences. The categories can be pre-defined or inferred from the interviews by using a thematic analysis approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in recent versions the method is not used solely to bring back what happened during interaction1, but also to encourage reflection on the participants experiences as they watch the video in the ‘here and now’ of interaction2. 8 , 23 , 24 Thus, VISRIs are conducted with the aim of identifying descriptive categories characterizing informants’ experiences. The categories can be pre-defined or inferred from the interviews by using a thematic analysis approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In summary, while CA addresses interactants' (external) actions, VSRI enables an exploration of their (internal) experiences, and thus the reasoning governing their actions. 24 Together, the two approaches can be used to illuminate a) the specific processes in community pharmacy encounters where patients are invited (or not invited) to engage in sharing their perspectives, and b) the reasons behind.…”
Section: Video-stimulated Recall Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology is a joint process of meaning-making as the interviewer and informant together attempt to make the implicit explicit through dialogue. This allows for reflexive co-analysis beyond informants’ actual experiences there and then while removing unnecessary constraints to discovery [ 62 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peräkylä et al, 2015); another would be to investigate disengagement behaviors in couples suffering from conditions associated with difficulties with emotion regulation (such as borderline personality disorder; Soloff, 2018); the third would be elicit participants' accounts of subjective experiences in relation to disengagement behaviors during complaint sequences (cf. Janusz and Peräkylä, 2020).…”
Section: Limitations and Direction For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%