2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00679-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality indicators for the evaluation of end-of-life care in Germany – a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data

Abstract: Background The provision and quality of end-of-life care (EoLC) in Germany is inconsistent. Therefore, an evaluation of current EoLC based on quality indicators is needed. This study aims to evaluate EoLC in Germany on the basis of quality indicators pertaining to curative overtreatment, palliative undertreatment and delayed palliative care (PC). Results were compared with previous findings. Methods Data from a statutory health insurance provider (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the data, 31.4% of the insured persons who died in 2017 received outpatient palliative care during the course of their illness; this figure is significantly below the estimated demand of up to 80% (Scholten et al 2016). Although this demand figure does not exclusively refer to outpatient services, which was the sole consideration of our data, the results nonetheless provide a clear indication of an undersupply of outpatient palliative care (Soziale Pflegeversicherung 2021; Ditscheid et al 2020;van Baal et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…According to the data, 31.4% of the insured persons who died in 2017 received outpatient palliative care during the course of their illness; this figure is significantly below the estimated demand of up to 80% (Scholten et al 2016). Although this demand figure does not exclusively refer to outpatient services, which was the sole consideration of our data, the results nonetheless provide a clear indication of an undersupply of outpatient palliative care (Soziale Pflegeversicherung 2021; Ditscheid et al 2020;van Baal et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…According to the claim data, the proposed appropriate threshold for proportion receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life and admission to the ICU in the last month of life were 10% and 4%, respectively [ 37 ]. Palliative care utilization and site of death have also been frequently discussed especially based on the whether the medical care was consistent with the patient’s needs [ 38 , 39 ]. Not only would the indicators themselves but also the strategy and frameworks to make quality indicators be useful for many non-cancer field healthcare providers, especially in CICUs, to understand the current concepts and methods of palliative care.…”
Section: The Quality Indicators For Palliative Care Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, specialist outpatient PC has increased in recent years, while the provision of generalist outpatient PC is rare and declining [11,12]. In addition, generalist outpatient PC tends to be provided relatively late in the care trajectory [11]. The early identi cation of patients with PC needs is particularly challenging for GPs in daily practice due to, among other reasons, prognostic uncertainty [13][14][15].…”
Section: Quality Of End-of-life Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality indicators are regularly applied to measure the quality of EoLC [7][8][9][10]. In Germany, specialist outpatient PC has increased in recent years, while the provision of generalist outpatient PC is rare and declining [11,12]. In addition, generalist outpatient PC tends to be provided relatively late in the care trajectory [11].…”
Section: Quality Of End-of-life Carementioning
confidence: 99%