Quality management in Hungarian higher education: organisational responses to governmental policy

Abstract

This article focuses on responses of higher education institutions to governmental policy. We investigate the influence of organisational characteristics on the implementation of quality management in Hungarian higher education institutions. Our theoretical framework is based on organisational theories (resource dependency and neoinstitutionalism), Allison's models on organisational decision-making processes, and also addresses some of the more specific characteristics of higher education institutions. Our empirical investigation shows that organisational characteristics matter in policy implementation of quality management in Hungarian higher education. Certain organisational variables, viz. leaders' commitment to the implementation process, the involvement of external consultants, institutional reputation, and bureaucratic and political decisionmaking processes have strong effects on the implementation of quality management. Characteristics particular to higher education institutions were much less influential.

Quality and quality assurance in Ethiopian higher education

“…This model is proposed by Csizmadia (2006) based on insights derived from a review of quality assurance and management models previously described in the literature. This model is grounded in the basic system model that characterizes higher education as an academic organization.…”

“…One of their findings demonstrated a significant and positive relationship between size of study programs and active utilization of the external evaluation report in universities. Csizmadia (2006), in a study on the implementation of quality management in higher education institutions, applied institutional theory together with resource dependency to analyze the introduction of quality management in Hungarian higher education. He found that organizational characteristics (organizational complexity, leadership, decision-making processes etc.)…”

Application of generic quality management models in European universities

“…Also, it is essential the way quality management system based on ISO 9001 standard will be implemened. T. Csizmadia (2006) conducted the analysis of quality management at Hungarian higher education institutions. Results showed that the main obstacles to successful internal studies' quality management system according to ISO 9001 standard implementation are lack of leadership commitment, no real changes, quality management 'on paper', orientation towards certificate, no sufficient resources dedicated, resistance of older academics, documentation prepared by quality management centre with little consultation with faculty, lack of competence in the field of quality management.…”

“…systems of performance indicators. T. Csizmadia (2006) uncovered what 'input', 'process' and 'output' are in the context of higher education. According to the author:…”

Tying down global to lobal: identifying the influential factors affecting the progress and outcomes of accreditation processes in Dutch-Caribbean universities

“…Multiple meanings have been given to quality depending on the perception, perspective, focus and individual analysis of the particular author or based on the view of the customer. Csizmadia (2006) states "There is no single, absolute, agreed or universally accepted definition of the term, but there exists a range of overlapping interpretations of it" (p.23). Van Bruggen et al (1998) describe that "Quality is a multi-dimensional concept; it is dynamic and expresses itself in continuous innovation" (p.84).…”