2010
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): Scale Development and Metric Properties

Abstract: The consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI) for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are poorly investigated, and a TBI-specific instrument has not previously been available. The cross-cultural development of a new measure to assess HRQoL after TBI is described.An international TBI Task Force derived a conceptual model from previous work, constructed an initial item bank of 148 items, and then reduced the item set through two successive multi-centre validation studies. The first study with eight languag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
223
3
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
223
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Extreme skewness can however create problems for analysis using correlations, reducing the probability that a scale will show strong relationships with other measures, and its reliability (or precision of measurement) of a scale. Skewness was checked but, however, some moderately skewed items were included, to capture a range of impairments [19]. Multivariate regression analyses were performed for the influence of sex, age, educational level, TBI to DC time, Worst GCS score, pupillary response, TBI to questionnaire time, whether performed cranioplasty, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, temperature of patient, midline shift on computed tomography scan, fasting blood glucose, whether or not treated in a rehabilitation center, days of use of mannitol and use of barbiturate sedation to the 6 different QOLI-BRI domain scores and total score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Extreme skewness can however create problems for analysis using correlations, reducing the probability that a scale will show strong relationships with other measures, and its reliability (or precision of measurement) of a scale. Skewness was checked but, however, some moderately skewed items were included, to capture a range of impairments [19]. Multivariate regression analyses were performed for the influence of sex, age, educational level, TBI to DC time, Worst GCS score, pupillary response, TBI to questionnaire time, whether performed cranioplasty, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, temperature of patient, midline shift on computed tomography scan, fasting blood glucose, whether or not treated in a rehabilitation center, days of use of mannitol and use of barbiturate sedation to the 6 different QOLI-BRI domain scores and total score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test-retest reliability of the QOLIBRI scales was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), calculated between the scale means on two occasions (retested on average 14 days after initial testing). The conventional interpretation of the ICC is that values of 0.40-0.75 are fair to good and values over 0.75 are excellent [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The QOLIBRI is a 37-item questionnaire that includes a 5-point Likert scale with scoring from 1 "not at all satisfied" to 5 "very satisfied" [38]. Part one measures satisfaction level regarding cognition, feelings and emotions, autonomy and daily life, and social relationships.…”
Section: Quantitative Data Collection-quality Of Life After Brain Injmentioning
confidence: 99%