2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2005.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of move-optimal schedules for minimizing total weighted completion time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem under study, Q|| ∑ w j C j , is a generalization of the problem in an environment with identical parallel machines, represented by P|| ∑ w j C j . For this problem, Brueggemann et al [43] determined that the performance guarantee for solutions obtained using the Jump neighborhood lies within the interval [1.2, (3m − 1)/2m]. Regarding this result, it can be observed that the parametric upper bound for the performance guarantee for the Jump neighborhood proposed in Lemma 5 coincides with the value reported in [43] when s 1 = s m = 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem under study, Q|| ∑ w j C j , is a generalization of the problem in an environment with identical parallel machines, represented by P|| ∑ w j C j . For this problem, Brueggemann et al [43] determined that the performance guarantee for solutions obtained using the Jump neighborhood lies within the interval [1.2, (3m − 1)/2m]. Regarding this result, it can be observed that the parametric upper bound for the performance guarantee for the Jump neighborhood proposed in Lemma 5 coincides with the value reported in [43] when s 1 = s m = 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…These open gaps highlight a research opportunity to establish a tight performance guarantee for the problem or narrow the gap between the upper and lower bounds. However, the challenge seems complicated since some gaps have remained open for over fifteen years, such as the gap of the P|| ∑ w j C j problem [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This penalty seems to be appropriate when each job should be provided with a different due date, the weighting expressing the relative importance of each order. Some recent references addressing weighted completion time minimisation are Tang et al (2006) for the hybrid flowshop, and Brueggemann et al (2006) for the identical machine case.…”
Section: Simultaneous Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of moves needed to find a jump‐optimal solution by means of an iterative improvement procedure is \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{amsmath, amssymb} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \begin{align*}\mathcal{O}(n^2)\end{align*} \end{document} (as shown by Brucker et al [3]) and there exist instances for which this bound is asymptotically tight (as shown by Hurkens and Vredeveld [12]). Other results on performance guarantees of local optima in the area of scheduling have been derived by Brueggemann et al [4] (for minimizing the total weighted completion time as objective function) and by Recalde et al [15] (for makespan minimization on a certain variant of related parallel machines).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%